Gregg Richard E, Helfenbein Eric D, Babaeizadeh Saeed
Advanced Algorithm Research Center, Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA.
J Electrocardiol. 2013 Nov-Dec;46(6):528-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
ECG detection of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the presence of left bundle-branch block (LBBB) is challenging due to ST deviation from the altered conduction. The purpose of this study was to introduce a new algorithm for STEMI detection in LBBB and compare the performance to three existing algorithms.
Source data of the study group (143 with acute MI and 239 controls) comes from multiple sources. ECGs were selected by computer interpretation of LBBB. Acute MI reference was hospital discharge diagnosis. Automated measurements came from the Philips DXL algorithm. Three existing algorithms were compared, (1) Sgarbossa criteria, (2) Selvester 10% RS criteria and (3) Smith 25% S-wave criteria. The new algorithm uses an ST threshold based on QRS area. All algorithms share the concordant ST elevation and anterior ST depression criteria from the Sgarbossa score. The difference is in the threshold for discordant ST elevation. The Sgarbossa, Selvester, Smith and Philips discordant ST elevation criteria are (1) ST elevation ≥ 500 μV, (2) ST elevation ≥ 10% of |S|-|R| plus STEMI limits, (3) ST elevation ≥ 25% of the S-wave amplitude and (4) ST elevation ≥ 100 μV + 1050 μV/Ash * QRS area. The Smith S-wave and Philips QRS area criteria were tested using both a single and 2 lead requirement. Algorithm performance was measured by sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio (LR+).
Algorithm performance can be organized in bands of similar sensitivity and specificity ranging from Sgarbossa score ≥ 3 with the lowest sensitivity and highest specificity, 13.3% and 97.9%, to the Selvester 10% rule with the highest sensitivity and lower specificity of 30.1% and 93.2%. The Smith S-wave and Philips QRS area algorithms were in the middle band with sensitivity and specificity of (20.3%, 94.9%) and (23.8%, 95.8%) respectively.
As can be seen from the difference between Sgarbossa score ≥ 3 and other algorithms for STEMI in LBBB, a discordant ST elevation criterion improves the sensitivity for detection but also results in a drop in specificity. For applications of automated STEMI detection that require higher sensitivity, the Selvester algorithm is better. For applications that require a low false positive rate such as relying on the algorithm for pre-hospital activation of cardiac catheterization laboratory for urgent PCI, it may be better to use the 2 lead Philips QRS area or Smith 25% S-wave algorithm.
在存在左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的情况下,通过心电图(ECG)检测ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)具有挑战性,因为传导改变会导致ST段偏移。本研究的目的是引入一种用于在LBBB中检测STEMI的新算法,并将其性能与三种现有算法进行比较。
研究组(143例急性心肌梗死患者和239例对照)的源数据来自多个来源。通过计算机对LBBB的解读来选择心电图。急性心肌梗死的参考诊断为出院诊断。自动测量来自飞利浦DXL算法。比较了三种现有算法,(1)Sgarbossa标准,(2)Selvester 10% RS标准和(3)Smith 25% S波标准。新算法使用基于QRS波面积的ST段阈值。所有算法都采用了Sgarbossa评分中一致的ST段抬高和前壁ST段压低标准。不同之处在于不一致性ST段抬高的阈值。Sgarbossa、Selvester、Smith和飞利浦的不一致性ST段抬高标准分别为(1)ST段抬高≥500 μV,(2)ST段抬高≥|S|-|R|的10%加上STEMI限值,(3)ST段抬高≥S波振幅的25%,以及(4)ST段抬高≥100 μV + 1050 μV/Ash * QRS波面积。Smith S波和飞利浦QRS波面积标准分别使用单导联和双导联要求进行测试。算法性能通过敏感性、特异性和阳性似然比(LR+)来衡量。
算法性能可以按照敏感性和特异性相似的区间进行排列,从敏感性最低、特异性最高的Sgarbossa评分≥3(分别为13.3%和97.9%),到敏感性最高、特异性较低的Selvester 10%规则(分别为30.1%和93.2%)。Smith S波算法和飞利浦QRS波面积算法处于中间区间,敏感性和特异性分别为(20.3%,94.9%)和(23.8%,95.8%)。
从Sgarbossa评分≥3与其他用于LBBB中STEMI检测的算法之间的差异可以看出,不一致性ST段抬高标准提高了检测的敏感性,但也导致特异性下降。对于需要更高敏感性的自动STEMI检测应用,Selvester算法更好。对于需要低假阳性率的应用,例如依靠该算法进行院前激活心脏导管实验室以进行紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),使用双导联飞利浦QRS波面积算法或Smith 25% S波算法可能更好。