Department of Pediatrics, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Oct;95(10):4652-9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-0677. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
The diversity of pediatric dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone mineral density (BMD) reference databases raises questions as to whether they are interchangeable in their application. This study examined the comparability of BMD Z-scores generated from the largest available Hologic DXA databases, applied on BMD results of a large series of unselected pediatric patients.
A total of 2027 BMD scans were extracted from Hologic QDR-4500A machines. Age- and sex-specific BMD Z-scores of children aged 8-17 yr, calculated from six Hologic databases, were compared for lumbar spine (LS) and total body (TB). The final dataset included 708 scans (307 of girls).
BMD Z-scores calculated from the six databases were highly correlated but differed significantly (P < 0.001) in both scan regions. Interdatabase Z-score differences (boys/girls, respectively) were up to 0.54/0.55 for LS and 1.0/0.83 for TB. These differences also varied significantly among age groups. In girls, the percentage of LS BMD Z-scores of -2 or below ("low BMD for age") varied between 15.4 and 27.9% (P < 0.012). The percentage of TB BMD Z-scores of -2 or below varied similarly in boys (P < 0.009).
Clinically relevant differences in BMD Z-scores exist between the Hologic databases, revealing a significant potential for misdiagnosis. Ideally, Z-scores should be calculated using model-, brand-, and software-specific reference curves for age, sex, and ethnic group. However, our results can be used to estimate converted values. There are other differences in children's bone mass, shape, strength, and body size that are not detected by DXA.
儿科双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)骨密度(BMD)参考数据库的多样性引发了一个疑问,即它们在应用中是否可以互换。本研究旨在检查从最大的可用 Hologic DXA 数据库中生成的 BMD Z 分数的可比性,这些数据库应用于大量未经选择的儿科患者的 BMD 结果。
从 Hologic QDR-4500A 机器中提取了 2027 次 BMD 扫描。从六个 Hologic 数据库计算了年龄和性别特异性的 8-17 岁儿童的腰椎(LS)和全身(TB)BMD Z 分数,并对其进行了比较。最终数据集包括 708 次扫描(女孩 307 次)。
六个数据库计算出的 BMD Z 分数高度相关,但在两个扫描区域均存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。数据库间 Z 分数差异(男孩/女孩,分别)最高可达 LS 处的 0.54/0.55 和 TB 处的 1.0/0.83。这些差异在年龄组之间也存在显著差异。在女孩中,LS BMD Z 分数为-2 或以下(“年龄低 BMD”)的比例在 15.4%至 27.9%之间(P < 0.012)。男孩中,TB BMD Z 分数为-2 或以下的比例也相似(P < 0.009)。
Hologic 数据库之间存在 BMD Z 分数的临床相关差异,这表明存在潜在的误诊风险。理想情况下,应使用针对年龄、性别和种族的特定模型、品牌和软件的参考曲线计算 Z 分数。然而,我们的结果可以用于估计转换值。DXA 无法检测到儿童骨量、形状、强度和体型的其他差异。