Caplan David
Neuropsychology Lab, M.G.H.
Lang Cogn Process. 2010 Jul;25(6):866-901. doi: 10.1080/01690961003672447.
BOLD signal was measured in sixteen participants who made timed font change detection judgments in visually presented sentences that varied in syntactic structure and the order of animate and inanimate nouns. Behavioral data indicated that sentences were processed to the level of syntactic structure. BOLD signal increased in visual association areas bilaterally and left supramarginal gyrus in the contrast of sentences with object- and subject-extracted relative clauses without font changes in which the animacy order of the nouns biased against the syntactically determined meaning of the sentence. This result differs from the findings in a non-word detection task (Caplan et al, 2008a), in which the same contrast led to increased BOLD signal in the left inferior frontal gyrus. The difference in areas of activation indicates that the sentences were processed differently in the two tasks. These differences were further explored in an eye tracking study using the materials in the two tasks. Issues pertaining to how parsing and interpretive operations are affected by a task that is being performed, and how this might affect BOLD signal correlates of syntactic contrasts, are discussed.
对16名参与者进行了血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号测量,这些参与者要对视觉呈现的句子进行限时字体变化检测判断,这些句子的句法结构以及有生命和无生命名词的顺序各不相同。行为数据表明,句子被处理到了句法结构层面。在无字体变化的宾语提取和主语提取关系从句的句子对比中,双侧视觉联合区和左侧缘上回的BOLD信号增强,其中名词的生命性顺序与句子的句法确定意义相悖。这一结果与非单词检测任务的研究结果(卡普兰等人,2008年a)不同,在该任务中,相同的对比导致左侧额下回的BOLD信号增强。激活区域的差异表明,这两个任务中句子的处理方式不同。利用这两个任务中的材料进行了一项眼动追踪研究,进一步探讨了这些差异。讨论了与句法分析和解释操作如何受到正在执行的任务影响,以及这可能如何影响句法对比的BOLD信号相关性有关的问题。