• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管外皮细胞瘤:长期预后再探讨。临床文章。

Hemangiopericytoma: long-term outcome revisited. Clinical article.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2011 Mar;114(3):747-55. doi: 10.3171/2010.6.JNS091660. Epub 2010 Jul 30.

DOI:10.3171/2010.6.JNS091660
PMID:20672899
Abstract

OBJECT

Hemangiopericytomas are rare tumors that behave aggressively with a high rate of local recurrence and distant metastases. With the aim of determining the outcome and response to various treatment modalities, a series of 39 patients who underwent microsurgical resection for primary meningeal hemangiopericytoma over a 24-year period is presented.

METHODS

Patients with hemangiopericytoma were identified from histopathology records and their medical records were analyzed retrospectively by 2 independent reviewers to collect data on surgical treatment, adjuvant therapy, postoperative course, local or distant recurrence, and follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 39 patients, 19 were male and 20 were female. Mean patient age was 44.1 years. Thirty-four tumors were intracranial and 5 were spinal. The mean follow-up period was 123 months. Twenty-eight patients developed local recurrence. The recurrence rate at 1, 5, and 15 years was 3.5%, 46%, and 92%, respectively. Extraneural metastasis occurred in 8 patients (26%) at an average of 123 months after initial surgery. Recurrences and metastases were treated by surgical excision, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), chemotherapy, and/or stereotactic radiosurgery. Adjuvant EBRT following initial surgery was found to extend the disease-free interval from 154 months to 254 months, although it did not prevent the development of metastasis. In those patients with EBRT and complete resection, the mean recurrence-free interval was found to be 126.3 months longer (p = 0.04) and overall survival 126 months longer than without EBRT. Furthermore, adjusting for resection, patients undergoing EBRT had 0.33 times increased risk of recurrence compared with those who did not (p = 0.03). A majority of patients remained able to live independently despite revision surgery for recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The mean follow-up of this patient series represents the longest follow-up duration published to date and demonstrates extended survival in a significant number of patients with hemangiopericytoma. Gross-total resection followed by adjuvant EBRT provides patients with the highest probability of an increased recurrence-free interval and overall survival. Prolonged survival justifies long-term follow-up and aggressive treatment of initial, recurrent, and metastatic disease.

摘要

目的

血管外皮细胞瘤是一种罕见的侵袭性肿瘤,具有较高的局部复发率和远处转移率。为了确定各种治疗方法的结果和反应,我们对 24 年来接受显微手术切除原发性脑膜血管外皮细胞瘤的 39 例患者进行了系列研究。

方法

通过组织病理学记录确定血管外皮细胞瘤患者,并由 2 名独立评审员回顾性分析其病历,以收集手术治疗、辅助治疗、术后过程、局部或远处复发以及随访等数据。

结果

39 例患者中,男性 19 例,女性 20 例。平均患者年龄为 44.1 岁。34 例肿瘤位于颅内,5 例位于脊髓。平均随访时间为 123 个月。28 例患者发生局部复发。1、5 和 15 年的复发率分别为 3.5%、46%和 92%。8 例(26%)患者在初次手术后平均 123 个月出现颅外转移。复发和转移采用手术切除、外照射放疗(EBRT)、化疗和/或立体定向放射外科治疗。研究发现,初次手术后辅助 EBRT 将无疾病间隔从 154 个月延长至 254 个月,尽管它不能预防转移的发生。在接受 EBRT 和完全切除的患者中,无复发生存期平均延长 126.3 个月(p=0.04),总生存期延长 126 个月。此外,在调整了切除程度后,接受 EBRT 的患者复发风险比未接受 EBRT 的患者增加了 0.33 倍(p=0.03)。尽管需要进行复发性手术,但大多数患者仍能独立生活。

结论

本患者系列的平均随访时间代表了迄今为止发表的最长随访时间,并证明了大多数血管外皮细胞瘤患者的生存时间延长。大体全切除后辅助 EBRT 为患者提供了增加无复发生存期和总生存期的最大可能性。长期生存证明了长期随访和积极治疗初始、复发性和转移性疾病的合理性。

相似文献

1
Hemangiopericytoma: long-term outcome revisited. Clinical article.血管外皮细胞瘤:长期预后再探讨。临床文章。
J Neurosurg. 2011 Mar;114(3):747-55. doi: 10.3171/2010.6.JNS091660. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
2
Stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial hemangiopericytomas: a multicenter study.立体定向放射外科治疗颅内血管外皮细胞瘤:一项多中心研究。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;126(3):744-754. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152860. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
3
Management of recurrent intracranial hemangiopericytoma.复发性颅内血管外皮细胞瘤的治疗。
J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Nov;18(11):1500-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2011.04.009. Epub 2011 Sep 13.
4
Intracranial hemangiopericytoma--our experience in 30 years: a series of 43 cases and review of the literature.颅内血管外皮细胞瘤——30 年经验总结:43 例系列病例并文献复习。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Mar-Apr;81(3-4):556-62. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
5
Management of recurrent meningeal hemangiopericytoma.复发性脑膜血管外皮细胞瘤的管理
Cancer. 1998 May 15;82(10):1915-20.
6
Intracranial hemangiopericytoma: treatment outcomes in a consecutive series.颅内血管外皮细胞瘤:连续病例系列的治疗结果
Zentralbl Neurochir. 2007 Aug;68(3):111-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-981674. Epub 2007 Jul 30.
7
Radiosurgery for intracranial hemangiopericytomas: outcomes after initial and repeat Gamma Knife surgery.伽玛刀治疗颅内血管外皮细胞瘤:初次和再次伽玛刀治疗后的结果。
J Neurosurg. 2010 Jan;112(1):133-9. doi: 10.3171/2009.3.JNS0923.
8
Intracranial meningeal hemangiopericytoma: 10 years experience of a tertiary care Institute.颅内脑膜血管外皮细胞瘤:一家三级医疗中心的 10 年经验。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Sep;154(9):1647-51. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1442-x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
9
Adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery after resection of intracranial hemangiopericytomas.颅内血管外皮细胞瘤切除术后的辅助立体定向放射外科治疗。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Dec 1;72(5):1333-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.03.024. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
10
Multimodal treatment and management strategies for intracranial hemangiopericytoma.颅内血管外皮细胞瘤的多模式治疗与管理策略
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Apr;22(4):718-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.11.011. Epub 2015 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
WHO Grade II or III Solitary Fibrous Tumors (Hemangiopericytomas) of the Spine: Two Case Reports with a Comprehensive Review of the Literature.世界卫生组织II级或III级脊柱孤立性纤维性肿瘤(血管外皮细胞瘤):两例报告并对文献进行全面综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 27;14(17):6068. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176068.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy after gross total resection of intracranial solitary fibrous tumors.颅内孤立性纤维瘤全切除术后辅助放疗疗效的系统评价与Meta分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23368. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02170-0.
3
A clinical investigation of extracranial metastases in 17 cases of intracranial solitary fibrous tumors.
17例颅内孤立性纤维瘤颅外转移的临床研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 1;23(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03902-2.
4
Identification of intracranial solitary fibrous tumor and atypical meningioma by multi-parameter MRI-based radiomics model.基于多参数MRI的放射组学模型鉴别颅内孤立性纤维瘤和非典型脑膜瘤
Discov Oncol. 2025 Jun 17;16(1):1137. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02988-0.
5
A Case of Intracranial Solitary Fibrous Tumor Followed by Distant Metastasis without Local Recurrence.一例颅内孤立性纤维瘤伴远处转移且无局部复发
NMC Case Rep J. 2025 Apr 25;12:181-188. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0284. eCollection 2025.
6
Meningeal malignant solitary fibrous tumor with multiple recurrence, extracranial extension, cervical lymph node metastases: case report and review of the literature.脑膜恶性孤立性纤维瘤伴多次复发、颅外扩展及颈部淋巴结转移:病例报告及文献复习
Discov Oncol. 2025 May 12;16(1):732. doi: 10.1007/s12672-025-02441-2.
7
An Invasive Solitary Fibrous Tumor/Hemangiopericytoma Originating From the Falx: A Case Report.起源于大脑镰的侵袭性孤立性纤维性肿瘤/血管外皮细胞瘤:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Dec 17;16(12):e75850. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75850. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing reoperation with solitary fibrous tumors/hemangiopericytomas and malignant progression of tumors.患者行再次手术治疗孤立性纤维肿瘤/血管外皮细胞瘤和肿瘤恶性进展的临床结局。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Oct 10;47(1):773. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02956-2.
9
Sellar hemangiopericytoma masquerading as pituitary adenoma: an overlooked intriguing case study unveiling a rare surgical conundrum.伪装成垂体腺瘤的鞍区血管外皮细胞瘤:一个被忽视的有趣病例研究揭示了一个罕见的手术难题。
Front Surg. 2024 May 22;11:1359787. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1359787. eCollection 2024.
10
Efficacy and toxicity of photon, proton, and carbon ion radiotherapy in the treatment of intracranial solitary fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma.光子、质子和碳离子放疗治疗颅内孤立性纤维瘤/血管外皮细胞瘤的疗效和毒性。
Radiat Oncol. 2024 Mar 29;19(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02434-5.