Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Program, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;72(2):183-93. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05311yel. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
Because clinical and biologic research and optimal clinical practice require stability of diagnoses over time, we determined stability of ICD-10 psychotic disorder diagnoses and sought predictors of diagnostic instability.
Patients from the McLean-Harvard International First-Episode Project, conducted from 1989 to 2003, who were hospitalized for first psychotic illnesses (N = 500) were diagnosed by ICD-10 criteria at baseline and 24 months, on the basis of extensive prospective assessments, to evaluate the longitudinal stability of specific categorical diagnoses and predictors of diagnostic change.
Diagnostic stability averaged 90.4%, ranking as follows: schizoaffective disorder (100.0%) > mania with psychosis (99.0%) > mixed affective episode (94.9%) > schizophrenia (94.6%) > delusional disorder (88.2%) > severe depressive episode with psychotic symptoms (85.2%) > acute psychosis with/without schizophrenia symptoms = unspecified psychosis (all 66.7%) >> acute schizophrenia-like psychosis (28.6%). Diagnoses changed by 24 months of follow-up to schizoaffective disorder (37.5%), bipolar disorder (25.0%), schizophrenia (16.7%), or unspecified nonorganic psychosis (8.3%), mainly through emerging affective features. By logistic regression, diagnostic change was associated with Schneiderian first-rank psychotic symptoms at intake > lack of premorbid substance use.
We found some psychotic disorder diagnoses to be more stable by ICD-10 than DSM-IV criteria in the same patients, with implications for revisions of both diagnostic systems.
由于临床和生物学研究以及最佳临床实践需要诊断在时间上的稳定性,我们确定了 ICD-10 精神病性障碍诊断的稳定性,并寻找了诊断不稳定的预测因素。
来自于 1989 年至 2003 年进行的麦克莱恩-哈佛国际首发项目的患者,在首次出现精神病性疾病时住院(N=500),根据广泛的前瞻性评估,基于 ICD-10 标准在基线和 24 个月时进行诊断,以评估特定分类诊断的纵向稳定性和诊断变化的预测因素。
诊断稳定性平均为 90.4%,排名如下:分裂情感性障碍(100.0%)>有精神病性症状的躁狂(99.0%)>混合情感发作(94.9%)>精神分裂症(94.6%)>妄想障碍(88.2%)>伴有精神病性症状的严重抑郁发作(85.2%)>伴有/不伴有精神分裂症症状的急性精神病性发作=未特指的精神病性障碍(均为 66.7%)>>急性精神分裂症样精神病性发作(28.6%)。在 24 个月的随访中,诊断变化为分裂情感性障碍(37.5%)、双相障碍(25.0%)、精神分裂症(16.7%)或未特指的非器质性精神病性障碍(8.3%),主要是通过出现情感特征。通过逻辑回归,诊断变化与入院时的 Schneider 一级精神病性症状>无前驱物质使用有关。
我们发现一些精神病性障碍诊断在相同的患者中,ICD-10 比 DSM-IV 标准更稳定,这对两个诊断系统的修订都有影响。