Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, Department of Psychology, Saarland University, Building A2.4, PO Box 15 11 50, Germany.
Brain Res. 2010 Oct 1;1354:113-22. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.07.058. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
We investigated whether the crossmodal congruency effect, normally observed in spatial compatibility tasks, would also affect performance on a task based on discriminating stimulus identity (i.e., a non-spatial dimension). Two rhythms were presented to participants' eyes, ears, and/or hands in a 4-alternative rhythm discrimination task. Stimulus identity and stimulus modality were varied orthogonally. When the target and distractor rhythms were presented in different sensory modalities, significant crossmodal congruency effects were observed in all conditions (i.e., performance on the incongruent distractor trials was significantly more error-prone than on the congruent distractor trials). In contrast to the results of previous studies, these crossmodal distractor effects were neither based on the spatial compatibility of the stimuli nor on an abstract semantic matching of stimulus identity, but instead on the identity of the target rhythm. Intriguingly, the magnitude of the crossmodal congruency effects differed as a function of the target modality, but were unaffected by the modality of the distractor.
我们研究了在空间兼容性任务中通常观察到的跨模态一致性效应是否也会影响基于刺激身份辨别(即非空间维度)的任务的表现。在 4 种选择的节奏辨别任务中,向参与者的眼睛、耳朵和/或手呈现两种节奏。刺激身份和刺激模式正交变化。当目标和干扰节奏呈现于不同的感觉模态中时,在所有条件下都观察到显著的跨模态一致性效应(即,在不一致的干扰试验上的表现比在一致的干扰试验上错误更多)。与之前研究的结果相反,这些跨模态干扰效应既不是基于刺激的空间兼容性,也不是基于刺激身份的抽象语义匹配,而是基于目标节奏的身份。有趣的是,跨模态一致性效应的大小随目标模态的不同而不同,但不受干扰模态的影响。