• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨模态情境下一致性序列效应的视觉优势

Visual dominance of the congruency sequence effect in a cross-modal context.

作者信息

Tang Xiaoyu, Zhang Xi, Wang Tingting, Yu Hongtao, Wang Aijun, Zhang Ming

机构信息

School of Psychology, Liaoning Collaborative Innovation Center of Children and Adolescents Healthy Personality Assessment and Cultivation, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.

Department of Psychology, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1504068. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1504068. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1504068
PMID:39744030
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11688488/
Abstract

The congruency sequence effect (CSE) refers to the reduction in the congruency effect in the current trial after an incongruent trial compared with a congruent trial. Although previous studies widely suggested that CSE was observed only in the modality repeat condition, few studies have reported that CSE could also appear in the modality switch condition. However, it remains unclear whether these conflicting findings were caused by partial repetition effects under modality transition conditions. To address this issue, Experiment 1 controlled for partial repetition effects by ensuring that the modality relationships in both the repetition and switch conditions were either fully congruent or incongruent. The results revealed significant CSE only under the modality repetition condition. In particular, a larger CSE was observed in visual-auditory (VA) repetition than in auditory-visual (AV) repetition, indicating that modality asymmetry might affect the CSE by inducing the priming effect. Thus, Experiment 2 concurrently presented visual and auditory stimuli to eliminate priming effects and further validated CSE differences between auditory and visual modalities. The results revealed that the CSE was significantly greater under the VA condition than under the AV condition and confirmed that the visual modality played a dominant role in the CSE, as visual information is prioritized in processing and ultimately reduces the congruency effect in the next trial. Overall, the present study provides evidence for the specificity of CSE under modality repetition conditions by excluding partial repetition effects and further underscores the critical role of visual dominance in cross-modal CSE.

摘要

一致性序列效应(CSE)是指与一致性试次相比,在不一致试次之后的当前试次中,一致性效应的降低。尽管先前的研究广泛表明,仅在模态重复条件下观察到CSE,但很少有研究报告CSE也可能出现在模态转换条件下。然而,这些相互矛盾的发现是否是由模态转换条件下的部分重复效应引起的,仍不清楚。为了解决这个问题,实验1通过确保重复条件和转换条件下的模态关系要么完全一致,要么完全不一致,来控制部分重复效应。结果显示,仅在模态重复条件下存在显著的CSE。特别是,在视觉-听觉(VA)重复中观察到的CSE比在听觉-视觉(AV)重复中更大,这表明模态不对称可能通过引发启动效应来影响CSE。因此,实验2同时呈现视觉和听觉刺激以消除启动效应,并进一步验证了听觉和视觉模态之间的CSE差异。结果显示,VA条件下的CSE显著大于AV条件下的CSE,并证实视觉模态在CSE中起主导作用,因为视觉信息在处理中具有优先性,并最终降低了下一试次中的一致性效应。总体而言,本研究通过排除部分重复效应,为模态重复条件下CSE的特异性提供了证据,并进一步强调了视觉优势在跨模态CSE中的关键作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11688488/47a721bdc2e4/fpsyg-15-1504068-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11688488/8eeda2bb161d/fpsyg-15-1504068-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11688488/89f8fb4ab12c/fpsyg-15-1504068-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11688488/d297999fe63a/fpsyg-15-1504068-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11688488/47a721bdc2e4/fpsyg-15-1504068-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11688488/8eeda2bb161d/fpsyg-15-1504068-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11688488/89f8fb4ab12c/fpsyg-15-1504068-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11688488/d297999fe63a/fpsyg-15-1504068-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5cd/11688488/47a721bdc2e4/fpsyg-15-1504068-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Visual dominance of the congruency sequence effect in a cross-modal context.跨模态情境下一致性序列效应的视觉优势
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1504068. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1504068. eCollection 2024.
2
Cognitive control in cross-modal contexts: Abstract feature transitions of task-related but not task-unrelated stimuli modulate the congruency sequence effect.跨模态情境下的认知控制:与任务相关而非无关刺激的抽象特征转换调节了一致序列效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Jun;50(6):902-919. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001300. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
3
Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict - controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect.调整对反应冲突的选择性注意——控制知觉冲突、目标-干扰物身份以及与一致性序列效应有关的一致性水平序列。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Aug;83(6):2531-2550. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02294-1. Epub 2021 May 4.
4
Modality-specific neural mechanisms of cognitive control in a Stroop-like task.在类似 Stroop 的任务中认知控制的模态特定神经机制。
Brain Cogn. 2021 Feb;147:105662. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105662. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
5
Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.在混杂最小化任务中,多种期望是一致性序列效应的基础。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102869. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102869. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
6
How modality processing differences affect cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition.模态加工差异如何影响跨模态非空间重复抑制。
Psych J. 2020 Jun;9(3):306-315. doi: 10.1002/pchj.332. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
7
Exploring behavioral adjustments of proportion congruency manipulations in an Eriksen flanker task with visual and auditory distractor modalities.探讨视觉和听觉干扰模态下,Eriksen 侧抑制任务中比例一致性操纵的行为调整。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jan;52(1):91-114. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01447-x. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
8
The congruency sequence effect of the Simon task in a cross-modality context.Simon 任务在跨模态情境中的一致序列效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Sep;49(9):1221-1235. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001145. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
9
Cross-task congruency sequence effect without the contribution of multiple expectancy.跨任务一致性序列效应,无需多种期望的贡献。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Mar;214:103268. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103268. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
10
Reappraising cognitive control: normal reactive adjustments following conflict processing are abolished by proactive emotion regulation.重新审视认知控制:冲突处理后的正常反应性调整被前瞻性情绪调节所消除。
Psychol Res. 2019 Feb;83(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1099-z. Epub 2018 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating the nature of spatial codes for different modes of Simon tasks: Evidence from congruency sequence effects and delta functions.探究不同模式西蒙任务的空间编码本质:来自一致性序列效应和德尔塔函数的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2024 Aug;50(8):819-841. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001220. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
2
Both congruent and incongruent trials drive the congruency sequence effect: Novel support for an episodic retrieval view of adaptive control in the prime-probe task.一致和不一致试验均会引发一致性序列效应:对启动-探测任务中适应性控制的情景检索观点的新支持。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2025 Feb;51(2):171-189. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001349. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
3
Transfer of cognitive control adjustments within and between speakers.
说话者内部及之间认知控制调整的转移。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 May 17:17470218241249471. doi: 10.1177/17470218241249471.
4
Proactive and reactive cognitive control in the absence of learning and memory confounds: Evidence from a cross-modal trial-unique Stroop task.在不存在学习和记忆混淆因素的情况下的主动和反应性认知控制:来自跨模态试验独特斯特鲁普任务的证据。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2024 Dec;78(4):245-255. doi: 10.1037/cep0000325. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
5
Cognitive control in cross-modal contexts: Abstract feature transitions of task-related but not task-unrelated stimuli modulate the congruency sequence effect.跨模态情境下的认知控制:与任务相关而非无关刺激的抽象特征转换调节了一致序列效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2024 Jun;50(6):902-919. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001300. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
6
EEG-based speaker-listener neural coupling reflects speech-selective attentional mechanisms beyond the speech stimulus.基于脑电图的说话者-倾听者神经耦合反映了超越语音刺激的语音选择性注意机制。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Nov 4;33(22):11080-11091. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad347.
7
Local and global control adjustments to stimulus-based task conflict in task switching.任务切换中基于刺激的任务冲突的局部和全局控制调整。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 May;78(5):963-977. doi: 10.1177/17470218231200442. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
8
Exploring behavioral adjustments of proportion congruency manipulations in an Eriksen flanker task with visual and auditory distractor modalities.探讨视觉和听觉干扰模态下,Eriksen 侧抑制任务中比例一致性操纵的行为调整。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jan;52(1):91-114. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01447-x. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
9
The congruency sequence effect of the Simon task in a cross-modality context.Simon 任务在跨模态情境中的一致序列效应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Sep;49(9):1221-1235. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001145. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
10
Task sets define boundaries of learned cognitive flexibility in list-wide proportion switch manipulations.任务集在广泛的比例切换操作中定义了习得认知灵活性的界限。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2023 Aug;49(8):1111-1122. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001138. Epub 2023 Jun 15.