• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位与糖尿病相关住院治疗:一项诊断为糖尿病患者的横断面研究。

Socioeconomic status and diabetes-related hospital admissions: a cross-sectional study of people with diagnosed diabetes.

机构信息

Public Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Nov;64(11):1022-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.094664. Epub 2010 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1136/jech.2009.094664
PMID:20675702
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with adverse cardiovascular risk factor patterns and poorer outcomes for people with diabetes.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed using data for 35,925 people with diagnosed diabetes in Scotland and an area-based measure of SES using linked hospital and population-based diabetes register records. Comparisons by quintile of SES were made before (with p values presented for trend across quintiles given below) and after adjusting for other factors using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

People in the most deprived quintile were more likely than people in the most affluent quintile to have hospital records for diabetic kidney disease (2.4% vs 2.0%, p=0.049), diabetic ketoacidosis (3.5% vs 3.0%, p=0.11), hypoglycaemia (1.8% vs 1.4%, p=0.008), ischaemic heart disease (22% vs 17%, p<0.0001), stroke (6.8% vs 5.1%, p<0.0001) and peripheral arterial disease (4.1% vs 2.1%, p<0.0001). An independent effect of SES persisted for cardiovascular disease outcomes after adjusting for age and sex. There were minimal differences in disease management measures by SES.

CONCLUSION

Managing current risk factors equitably is unlikely to remove socioeconomic inequalities in diabetes-related outcomes. Measures of SES may be valuable in risk scores and in making valid comparisons of the quality of diabetes care.

摘要

背景

低社会经济地位(SES)与心血管风险因素模式不良和糖尿病患者预后较差有关。

方法

使用苏格兰有确诊糖尿病的 35925 人数据和基于区域的 SES 衡量标准(使用链接的医院和人群为基础的糖尿病登记记录)进行了一项横断面研究。在调整了其他因素后,使用多变量逻辑回归对 SES 五分位数进行了比较(下面给出了五分位数之间的趋势的 p 值)。

结果

与最富裕五分位数的人相比,最贫困五分位数的人更有可能有糖尿病肾病的住院记录(2.4%对 2.0%,p=0.049)、糖尿病酮症酸中毒(3.5%对 3.0%,p=0.11)、低血糖(1.8%对 1.4%,p=0.008)、缺血性心脏病(22%对 17%,p<0.0001)、中风(6.8%对 5.1%,p<0.0001)和外周动脉疾病(4.1%对 2.1%,p<0.0001)。在调整年龄和性别后,SES 对心血管疾病结果仍有独立影响。SES 对疾病管理措施的差异很小。

结论

公平管理当前的风险因素不太可能消除与糖尿病相关结果的社会经济不平等。SES 指标在风险评分和评估糖尿病护理质量方面可能具有价值。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic status and diabetes-related hospital admissions: a cross-sectional study of people with diagnosed diabetes.社会经济地位与糖尿病相关住院治疗:一项诊断为糖尿病患者的横断面研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Nov;64(11):1022-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.094664. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
2
Comparison of different markers of socioeconomic status with cardiovascular disease and diabetes risk factors in the Diabetes, Heart and Health Survey.在糖尿病、心脏与健康调查中社会经济地位的不同标志物与心血管疾病及糖尿病风险因素的比较
N Z Med J. 2008 Feb 15;121(1269):45-56.
3
Impact of deprivation on cardiovascular risk factors in people with diabetes: an observational study.贫困对糖尿病患者心血管危险因素的影响:一项观察性研究。
Diabet Med. 2008 Feb;25(2):194-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02382.x.
4
Relationship of different measures of socioeconomic status with cardiovascular disease risk factors and lifestyle in a New Zealand workforce survey.新西兰劳动力调查中社会经济地位的不同衡量指标与心血管疾病风险因素及生活方式的关系
N Z Med J. 2007 Jan 26;120(1248):U2392.
5
The role of socio-economic factors on prevalence and health outcomes of persons with diabetes in Rome, Italy.意大利罗马社会经济因素对糖尿病患者患病率和健康结果的影响。
Eur J Public Health. 2013 Dec;23(6):991-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cks168. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
6
The influence of socioeconomic factors on cardiovascular disease risk factors in the context of economic development in the Samoan archipelago.在萨摩亚群岛经济发展背景下社会经济因素对心血管疾病风险因素的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Nov;63(10):2533-45. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.023. Epub 2006 Jul 31.
7
Area-based socioeconomic status, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular mortality in Scotland.基于地区的社会经济地位、苏格兰 2 型糖尿病和心血管死亡率。
Diabetologia. 2012 Nov;55(11):2938-45. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2667-1. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
8
Socio-economic inequalities in the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular risk factors and chronic diabetic complications in the Basque Country, Spain.西班牙巴斯克地区2型糖尿病患病率、心血管危险因素及慢性糖尿病并发症方面的社会经济不平等现象。
Diabet Med. 2005 Aug;22(8):1047-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01598.x.
9
Health-related quality of life predicts hospital admission within 1 year in people with diabetes: a nationwide study from Taiwan.健康相关生活质量可预测糖尿病患者 1 年内的住院情况:来自台湾的全国性研究。
Diabet Med. 2009 Oct;26(10):1055-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02818.x.
10
Socioeconomic position in childhood and cardiovascular risk factors in older Spanish people.西班牙老年人童年时期的社会经济地位与心血管危险因素
Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;33(4):723-30. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh105. Epub 2004 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
An eye on equity: faricimab-driven health equity improvements in diabetic macular oedema using a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis from a UK societal perspective.关注公平:从英国社会角度出发,采用分布成本效益分析,评估 faricimab 治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿对公平性的影响。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Jul;38(10):1917-1925. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03043-y. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
2
Social deprivation and diabetic kidney disease: A European view.社会剥夺与糖尿病肾病:欧洲视角。
J Diabetes Investig. 2024 May;15(5):541-556. doi: 10.1111/jdi.14156. Epub 2024 Jan 27.
3
The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on HbA1c Testing: Prioritization of High-Risk Cases and Impact of Social Deprivation.
2019年冠状病毒病大流行对糖化血红蛋白检测的影响:高危病例的优先排序及社会剥夺的影响
Diabetes Ther. 2023 Apr;14(4):691-707. doi: 10.1007/s13300-023-01380-x. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
4
The Diabetes Health Plan and Healthcare Utilization Among Beneficiaries with Low Incomes.低收入糖尿病患者的糖尿病健康计划和医疗保健利用情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(7):1672-1680. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07903-9. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
5
Healthcare use among people with diabetes mellitus in Europe: a population-based cross-sectional study.欧洲糖尿病患者的医疗保健使用情况:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Fam Med Community Health. 2022 Nov;10(4). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2022-001700.
6
Association between area-level socioeconomic status, accessibility and diabetes-related hospitalisations: a cross-sectional analysis of data from Western Victoria, Australia.基于澳大利亚维多利亚西部地区数据的横断面分析:地区社会经济地位、可达性与糖尿病住院治疗之间的关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 22;9(5):e026880. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026880.
7
Population-level impact of diabetes integrated care on commissioner payments for inpatient care among people with type 2 diabetes in Cambridgeshire: a postintervention cohort follow-up study.糖尿病综合护理对剑桥郡2型糖尿病患者住院治疗专员支付费用的人群水平影响:干预后队列随访研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 28;7(12):e015816. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015816.
8
Disentangling the influence of living place and socioeconomic position on health services use among diabetes patients: A population-based study.解析糖尿病患者居住地点和社会经济地位对医疗服务利用的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 29;12(11):e0188295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188295. eCollection 2017.
9
A survey on socioeconomic determinants of diabetes mellitus management in a lower middle income setting.低收入中等收入环境下糖尿病管理的社会经济决定因素调查。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 May 4;15:74. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0363-3.
10
Association between socioeconomic status and metabolic control and diabetes complications: a cross-sectional nationwide study in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.社会经济地位与代谢控制及糖尿病并发症之间的关联:一项针对中国成年2型糖尿病患者的全国性横断面研究。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016 Apr 5;15:61. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0376-7.