Hara Masahiko, Nishino Masami, Taniike Masayuki, Makino Nobuhiko, Kato Hiroyasu, Egami Yasuyuki, Shutta Ryu, Yamaguchi Hitoshi, Tanouchi Jun, Yamada Yoshio
Division of Cardiology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka, Japan.
Echocardiography. 2011 Jan;28(1):69-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01257.x.
Chronic effect of right ventricular (RV) pacing on left ventricular (LV) rotational synchrony is unknown. The aim of this study is to assess chronic effect of RV pacing on LV rotational synchrony using two-dimensional ultrasound speckle tracking imaging.
Thirty-one patients who underwent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation for complete atrioventricular block, and age- and sex-matched 10 healthy controls were assessed. We divided our patients into RV apical (RVA, n = 16) and RV outflow tract (RVOT, n = 15) pacing groups. We compared echocardiographic parameters such as LV rotational synchrony between pacing groups and healthy control. We defined Q to peak rotation interval as the interval from the beginning of the Q-wave to the peak apical counter-clockwise or peak basal clockwise rotation. We calculated apical-basal rotation delay by subtracting basal Q to peak rotation interval from apical one as the representative of rotational synchronization. Apical-basal rotation delay of RVA pacing was significantly longer than that of healthy control (100 ± 110 vs. -6 ± 15 ms, P = 0.002), while there was no statistically significant difference between RVOT pacing and healthy control (-3 ± 99 vs. -6 ± 15 ms, P = 0.919).
LV rotation during RVOT pacing is synchronous at 15 months after pacemaker implantation, while RVA pacing provokes LV rotational dyssynchrony by inducing delayed apical rotation at 7 years after pacemaker implantation in patients with complete atrioventricular block.
右心室(RV)起搏对左心室(LV)旋转同步性的慢性影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在使用二维超声斑点追踪成像评估RV起搏对LV旋转同步性的慢性影响。
对31例因完全性房室传导阻滞接受双腔起搏器植入的患者以及10名年龄和性别匹配的健康对照者进行了评估。我们将患者分为右心室心尖部(RVA,n = 16)起搏组和右心室流出道(RVOT,n = 15)起搏组。我们比较了起搏组与健康对照者之间的超声心动图参数,如LV旋转同步性。我们将Q波至峰值旋转间隔定义为从Q波开始到心尖逆时针峰值或基底顺时针峰值旋转的间隔。我们通过从心尖Q波至峰值旋转间隔中减去基底Q波至峰值旋转间隔来计算心尖-基底旋转延迟,作为旋转同步性的代表。RVA起搏的心尖-基底旋转延迟明显长于健康对照者(100±110 vs. -6±15 ms,P = 0.002),而RVOT起搏与健康对照者之间无统计学显著差异(-3±99 vs. -6±15 ms,P = 0.919)。
在起搏器植入15个月后,RVOT起搏期间的LV旋转是同步的,而在完全性房室传导阻滞患者中,起搏器植入7年后,RVA起搏通过诱导心尖旋转延迟引发LV旋转不同步。