Institute of Cardiovascular Research, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;52(4):825-33, 833.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.04.027. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel plus acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is superior to ASA alone in patients with acute coronary syndromes and in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. We sought to determine whether clopidogrel plus ASA conferred benefit on limb outcomes over ASA alone in patients undergoing below-knee bypass grafting.
Patients undergoing unilateral, below-knee bypass graft for atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were enrolled 2 to 4 days after surgery and were randomly assigned to clopidogrel 75 mg/day plus ASA 75 to 100 mg/day or placebo plus ASA 75 to 100 mg/day for 6 to 24 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of index-graft occlusion or revascularization, above-ankle amputation of the affected limb, or death. The primary safety endpoint was severe bleeding (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue plasminogen activator for Occluded coronary arteries [GUSTO] classification).
In the overall population, the primary endpoint occurred in 149 of 425 patients in the clopidogrel group vs 151 of 426 patients in the placebo (plus ASA) group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.23). In a prespecified subgroup analysis, the primary endpoint was significantly reduced by clopidogrel in prosthetic graft patients (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.45-0.95; P = .025) but not in venous graft patients (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.94-1.67, not significant [NS]). A significant statistical interaction between treatment effect and graft type was observed (P(interaction) = .008). Although total bleeds were more frequent with clopidogrel, there was no significant difference between the rates of severe bleeding in the clopidogrel and placebo (plus ASA) groups (2.1% vs 1.2%).
The combination of clopidogrel plus ASA did not improve limb or systemic outcomes in the overall population of PAD patients requiring below-knee bypass grafting. Subgroup analysis suggests that clopidogrel plus ASA confers benefit in patients receiving prosthetic grafts without significantly increasing major bleeding risk.
氯吡格雷联合乙酰水杨酸(ASA)双联抗血小板治疗优于急性冠状动脉综合征患者和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的 ASA 单药治疗。我们旨在确定在接受膝下旁路移植术的患者中,氯吡格雷联合 ASA 是否优于 ASA 单药治疗在肢体结局方面的获益。
手术后 2 至 4 天,接受单侧膝下旁路移植术治疗动脉粥样硬化性外周动脉疾病(PAD)的患者入组,并随机分配至氯吡格雷 75mg/天加 ASA 75 至 100mg/天或安慰剂加 ASA 75 至 100mg/天治疗 6 至 24 个月。主要疗效终点是索引移植物闭塞或再血管化、受累肢体踝上截肢或死亡的复合终点。主要安全性终点是严重出血(血栓溶解酶和组织型纤溶酶原激活剂用于闭塞冠状动脉的全球应用[GUSTO]分类)。
在总体人群中,氯吡格雷组 425 例患者中有 149 例(34.8%)发生主要终点事件,安慰剂(加 ASA)组 426 例患者中有 151 例(35.4%)(风险比[HR],0.98;95%置信区间[CI],0.78-1.23)。在预先指定的亚组分析中,氯吡格雷显著降低了假体移植物患者的主要终点事件(HR,0.65;95%CI,0.45-0.95;P=0.025),但在静脉移植物患者中未显著降低(HR,1.25;95%CI,0.94-1.67,无统计学意义[NS])。治疗效果和移植物类型之间存在显著的统计学交互作用(P(交互)=0.008)。虽然氯吡格雷组的总出血更为频繁,但氯吡格雷组和安慰剂(加 ASA)组的严重出血发生率无显著差异(2.1%比 1.2%)。
氯吡格雷联合 ASA 并未改善需要膝下旁路移植术的 PAD 患者的肢体或全身结局。亚组分析表明,氯吡格雷联合 ASA 对接受假体移植物的患者有益,而不会显著增加大出血风险。