RAND, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Aug;29(8):1532-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1091.
In an effort to rein in rising health care costs, health plans are using physician cost profiles as the basis for tiered networks that give patients incentives to visit low-cost physicians. Because physician cost profiles are often statistically unreliable some experts have argued that physician groups should be profiled instead. Using Massachusetts data, we evaluate the two options empirically. Although we find that physician-group profiles are statistically more reliable, the group profile is not a good predictor of individual physician performance within the group. Better methods for creating provider cost profiles are needed.
为了控制不断上涨的医疗保健成本,医保计划正在使用医生成本概况作为分层网络的基础,以激励患者访问低成本医生。由于医生成本概况在统计上往往不可靠,一些专家认为应该对医生群体进行概况分析。我们使用马萨诸塞州的数据对这两种选择进行了实证评估。尽管我们发现医生群体概况在统计上更可靠,但群体概况并不是群体内个别医生表现的良好预测指标。需要更好的方法来创建提供者成本概况。