Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
J Periodontol. 2010 Dec;81(12):1829-38. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100161. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
The use of recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) with a collagen carrier material has severe limitations in regards to space maintenance. The aim of this study was to test whether rhBMP-2 combinations with allografts or a mesh enhance the regeneration of missing bone and the subsequent placement of dental implants.
In five dogs, surgically created ridge defects were augmented using one of the following treatment modalities: 1) rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge (ACS) under a titanium mesh (Mesh); 2) rhBMP-2/ACS plus canine freeze-dried bone allograft; 3) rhBMP-2/ACS plus canine demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA); or 4) rhBMP-2/ACS wrapped around a canine cancellous allograft block (Block Allograft). Eight weeks later, dental implants were placed in the augmented areas. The dogs were sacrificed 16 weeks after bone augmentation and specimens obtained for histologic and histomorphometric analyses.
All sites augmented with DFDBA, and one site with Block Allograft did not allow placement of dental implants. In all other sites, dental implants were placed. The area of regenerated bone ranged between 23.40 mm(2) (freeze-dried bone allograft) and 35.16 mm(2) (Block Allograft). The greatest amount of bone was regenerated in the Block Allograft group ranging from 4.54 mm (at 1.5 mm), to 4.95 mm (at 3 mm), to 5.14 mm (at 4.5 mm). The least amount of bone was regenerated by the DFDBA group with values of 2.24 mm (at 1.5 mm), 2.84 mm (at 3 mm), and 3.34 mm (at 4.5 mm). Statistically significant differences were observed between DFDBA and block allograft at all three levels (P <0.001).
The combination of rhBMP-2 and a block allograft provides the greatest ridge width of the four treatment options used in this canine ridge augmentation model.
使用重组骨形态发生蛋白-2(rhBMP-2)与胶原载体材料在维持空间方面有严重的局限性。本研究的目的是测试 rhBMP-2 与同种异体移植物或网片的组合是否能增强骨缺损的再生,并随后植入牙种植体。
在 5 只狗中,通过以下一种治疗方式对手术产生的牙槽嵴缺损进行增强:1)钛网下 rhBMP-2/可吸收胶原海绵(ACS)(Mesh);2)rhBMP-2/ACS 加犬冻干骨同种异体移植物;3)rhBMP-2/ACS 加犬脱矿冻干骨同种异体移植物(DFDBA);或 4)rhBMP-2/ACS 包裹犬松质骨同种异体移植物块(Block Allograft)。8 周后,在增强区域植入牙种植体。骨增强后 16 周处死狗,获得标本进行组织学和组织形态计量学分析。
所有用 DFDBA 增强的部位,以及一个用 Block Allograft 增强的部位都不能放置牙种植体。所有其他部位都成功放置了牙种植体。再生骨的面积在 23.40mm²(冻干骨同种异体移植物)和 35.16mm²(Block Allograft)之间。在 Block Allograft 组中再生骨量最大,从 1.5mm 处的 4.54mm 到 3mm 处的 4.95mm 再到 4.5mm 处的 5.14mm。用 DFDBA 增强的部位再生骨量最少,在 1.5mm 处为 2.24mm,在 3mm 处为 2.84mm,在 4.5mm 处为 3.34mm。在所有三个水平上,DFDBA 与 Block Allograft 之间均存在统计学显著差异(P<0.001)。
在本犬牙槽嵴增强模型中,rhBMP-2 与块状同种异体移植物的组合提供了四种治疗方案中最大的牙槽嵴宽度。