Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Sultanate of Oman.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 May 1;36(10):770-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181df1a70.
Mechanical testing of cadaveric spines.
To determine whether vertebral body osteophytes act primarily to reduce compressive stress on the intervertebral discs, or to stabilize the spine in bending.
The mechanical significance of vertebral osteophytes is unclear.
Thoracolumbar spines were obtained from cadavers, aged 51 to 92 years, with vertebral body osteophytes, mostly anterolateral. Twenty motion segments, from T5-T6 to L3-L4, were loaded in compression to 1.5 kN, and then in flexion, extension, and lateral bending to 10 to 25 Nm (depending on specimen size) with a compressive preload. Vertebral movements were tracked using an optical 2-dimensional MacReflex system. Tests were performed in random order, and were repeated after excision of all osteophytes. Osteophyte function was inferred from (a) changes in the force or moment resisted and (b) changes in tangent stiffness, measured at maximum displacement or rotation angle. Volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual photon x-ray absorptiometry and water immersion. Results were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance.
Resistance to compression was reduced by an average of 17% after osteophyte removal (P < 0.05), and resistance to bending moment in flexion, extension, and left and right lateral bending was reduced by 49%, 36%, 36%, and 35%, respectively (all P < 0.01). Changes in tangent stiffness were similar. Osteophyte removal increased the neutral zone in bending (P < 0.05) and, on average, reduced motion segment BMD by 7% to 9%. Results were insensitive to applied loads and moments, but several changes were proportional to osteophyte size.
Vertebral body osteophytes resist bending movements more than compression. Because they reverse the instability in bending that can stimulate their formation, these osteophytes seem to be adaptive rather than degenerative. Results suggest that osteophytes could cause clinical BMD measurements to underestimate vertebral compressive strength.
尸体脊柱的力学测试。
确定椎体骨赘主要是减少椎间盘的压缩应力,还是稳定弯曲中的脊柱。
椎体骨赘的力学意义尚不清楚。
从年龄在 51 岁至 92 岁之间的尸体中获取胸腰椎,这些尸体有椎体骨赘,主要是前外侧的。20 个运动节段,从 T5-T6 到 L3-L4,在压缩下加载至 1.5 kN,然后在弯曲、伸展和侧向弯曲下加载至 10 至 25 Nm(取决于标本大小),具有压缩预载。使用光学二维 MacReflex 系统跟踪椎体运动。测试以随机顺序进行,在切除所有骨赘后重复进行。骨赘功能通过以下两种方式推断得出:(a)抵抗的力或力矩的变化,(b)在最大位移或旋转角度处测量的切线刚度的变化。使用双光子 X 射线吸收法和水浸法测量体积骨矿物质密度(BMD)。使用重复测量方差分析对结果进行分析。
骨赘切除后,压缩阻力平均降低了 17%(P < 0.05),弯曲时的抗弯矩(屈曲、伸展和左右侧弯曲)分别降低了 49%、36%、36%和 35%(均 P < 0.01)。切线刚度的变化相似。骨赘切除增加了弯曲时的中立区(P < 0.05),并且平均降低了运动节段 BMD 7%至 9%。结果对施加的力和力矩不敏感,但有几个变化与骨赘大小成比例。
椎体骨赘抵抗弯曲运动比压缩运动更有效。由于它们逆转了可以刺激其形成的弯曲不稳定,因此这些骨赘似乎是适应性的而不是退行性的。结果表明,骨赘可能导致临床 BMD 测量值低估椎体压缩强度。