Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Hepatology. 2010 Oct;52(4):1334-40. doi: 10.1002/hep.23821.
Colesevelam is an anion-exchange resin with a 7-fold higher bile acid-binding capacity and fewer side effects than cholestyramine, the current first-line treatment option for cholestatic pruritus. The aim of this trial was to compare the effects of colesevelam and a placebo in patients with cholestatic pruritus. In a randomized, double-blind, investigator-initiated, multicenter trial, patients with cholestatic pruritus, both treatment-naive and previously treated, received 1875 mg of colesevelam or an identical placebo twice daily for 3 weeks. The effect on pruritus was assessed with daily visual analogue scales, quality-of-life scores, and evaluations of cutaneous scratch lesions. The predefined primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with at least a 40% reduction in pruritus visual analogue scale scores. Thirty-eight patients were included, and 35 were evaluable: 17 took colesevelam, 18 took the placebo, 22 were female, 8 were treatment-naive, 14 had primary biliary cirrhosis, and 14 had primary sclerosing cholangitis. The mean serum bile acid levels were comparable between the groups before treatment (P = 0.74), but they were significantly different after treatment (P = 0.01) in favor of patients treated with colesevelam. Thirty-six percent of patients in the colesevelam group reached the primary endpoint versus 35% in the placebo group (P = 1.0). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to pruritus scores, quality-of-life scores, and severity of cutaneous scratch lesions. Mild side effects occurred in one colesevelam-treated patient and four placebo-treated patients.
Although colesevelam significantly decreased serum bile acid levels, this trial was unable to demonstrate that it was more effective than a placebo in alleviating the severity of pruritus of cholestasis.
考来烯胺是一种阴离子交换树脂,其胆汁酸结合能力比考来替泊(目前治疗胆汁淤积性瘙痒的一线药物)高 7 倍,副作用更少。本试验旨在比较考来烯胺和安慰剂在胆汁淤积性瘙痒患者中的疗效。在一项随机、双盲、研究者发起的、多中心试验中,初治和既往治疗的胆汁淤积性瘙痒患者每天服用 1875mg 考来烯胺或相同的安慰剂,疗程 3 周。瘙痒的疗效通过每日视觉模拟量表、生活质量评分和皮肤搔抓损伤评估来评价。主要终点是瘙痒视觉模拟量表评分至少降低 40%的患者比例。共纳入 38 例患者,其中 35 例可评估:17 例服用考来烯胺,18 例服用安慰剂,22 例为女性,8 例为初治,14 例为原发性胆汁性肝硬化,14 例为原发性硬化性胆管炎。治疗前两组患者的血清胆汁酸水平相当(P=0.74),但治疗后差异有统计学意义(P=0.01),考来烯胺组显著降低。考来烯胺组 36%的患者达到主要终点,安慰剂组为 35%(P=1.0)。两组瘙痒评分、生活质量评分和皮肤搔抓损伤严重程度无显著差异。1 例考来烯胺治疗患者和 4 例安慰剂治疗患者出现轻度副作用。
尽管考来烯胺显著降低了血清胆汁酸水平,但本试验未能证明其在缓解胆汁淤积性瘙痒严重程度方面优于安慰剂。