• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科恩kappa系数的标准误

The standard error of Cohen's Kappa.

作者信息

Garner J B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1991 May;10(5):767-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780100512.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780100512
PMID:2068430
Abstract

This paper gives a standard error for Cohen's Kappa, conditional on the margins of the observed r x r table. An explicit formula is given for the 2 x 2 table, and a procedure for the more general situation. A parsimonious log-linear model is suggested for the general case and an approximate confidence interval for kappa is based on that model. Numerical illustrations are given comparing the standard results with exact conditional results and those of the present paper. The conclusions are, first, that the standard error of kappa under the null hypothesis (that kappa is zero) should not be used except when the null is plausible; secondly, that the usual formula for the standard error appears appropriate except in the unusual circumstance of kappa taking large negative values; and, thirdly, in small samples the distribution of the estimate of kappa appears very non-symmetric, and it is preferable to base confidence intervals on transformations of kappa. A PC program with source code implementing the suggested procedures is available from the author.

摘要

本文给出了基于观测到的r×r表的边际条件下科恩kappa系数的标准误差。给出了2×2表的显式公式以及更一般情况的计算方法。针对一般情况提出了一个简约的对数线性模型,并基于该模型给出了kappa的近似置信区间。给出了数值示例,比较了标准结果与精确条件结果以及本文结果。结论如下:第一,除了在原假设合理的情况下,不应使用原假设(kappa为零)下kappa的标准误差;第二,标准误差的常用公式似乎是合适的,除非在kappa取大的负值这种不寻常的情况下;第三,在小样本中,kappa估计值的分布看起来非常不对称,最好基于kappa的变换来构建置信区间。作者可提供一个带有实现所建议程序的源代码的个人计算机程序。

相似文献

1
The standard error of Cohen's Kappa.科恩kappa系数的标准误
Stat Med. 1991 May;10(5):767-75. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780100512.
2
Exact one-sided confidence limits for Cohen's kappa as a measurement of agreement.作为一致性度量的科恩kappa系数的精确单侧置信限。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Apr;26(2):615-632. doi: 10.1177/0962280214552881. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
3
The standard error of Cohen's kappa by J. Barry Garner, Statistics in Medicine, 10, 767-775 (1991).
Stat Med. 1992 Aug;11(11):1530-2.
4
An alternative to Cohen's standardized mean difference effect size: a robust parameter and confidence interval in the two independent groups case.科恩标准化平均差效应量的一种替代方法:两独立组情况下的稳健参数和置信区间。
Psychol Methods. 2005 Sep;10(3):317-28. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.3.317.
5
Interval estimation for Cohen's kappa as a measure of agreement.作为一致性度量的科恩kappa系数的区间估计。
Stat Med. 2000 Mar 15;19(5):723-41. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000315)19:5<723::aid-sim379>3.0.co;2-a.
6
Asymptotic variability of (multilevel) multirater kappa coefficients.(多层次)多评分者kappa 系数的渐近变异性。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Oct-Nov;28(10-11):3012-3026. doi: 10.1177/0962280218794733. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
7
Intrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of labor.产时胎儿头部位置II:第二产程中经阴道指诊与经腹超声评估的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):264-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00656.x.
8
Standard errors and confidence intervals for correlations corrected for indirect range restriction: A simulation study comparing analytic and bootstrap methods.针对间接范围限制校正后的相关性的标准误差和置信区间:一项比较分析方法和自助法的模拟研究。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2018 Feb;71(1):39-59. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12105. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
9
Clinicians are right not to like Cohen's κ.临床医生不喜欢 Cohen's κ 是对的。
BMJ. 2013 Apr 12;346:f2125. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2125.
10
On non-inferiority analysis based on delta-method confidence intervals.基于德尔塔法置信区间的非劣效性分析。
J Biopharm Stat. 2003 Aug;13(3):565-83. doi: 10.1081/BIP-120022775.

引用本文的文献

1
Concurrent and discriminant validity of ActiGraph waist and wrist cut-points to measure sedentary behaviour, activity level, and posture in office work.ActiGraph 腰部和腕部切点在测量办公室工作中的久坐行为、活动水平和姿势方面的同时效度和区分效度。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 12;21(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10387-7.
2
Is rigorous retrospective harmonization possible? Application of the DataSHaPER approach across 53 large studies.严格的回顾性协调是否可行?DataSHaPER 方法在 53 项大型研究中的应用。
Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Oct;40(5):1314-28. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr106. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
3
Lack of reproducibility of linkage results in serially measured blood pressure data.
连续测量的血压数据中连锁结果缺乏可重复性。
BMC Genet. 2003 Dec 31;4 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-4-S1-S37.