Richling B, Bavinzski G, Gross C, Gruber A, Killer M
University of Vienna, Department of Neurosurgery; Vienna, Austria.
Interv Neuroradiol. 1995 Nov 30;1(1):19-27. doi: 10.1177/159101999500100105. Epub 2001 May 15.
Over the past 3.5 years 220 patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage were treated in the Department of Neurosurgery University of Vienna Medical School using either endovascular techniques (Guglielmi Detachable Coils) or open craniotomy with aneurysm clipping. A retrospective analysis was undertaken to assess whether any difference in outcome could be correlated with the treatment choice. The patients were stratified as to 1) Hunt and Hess grade at time of treatment, 2) method of treatment, and 3) clinical outcome at 2-4 weeks following treatment. The outcomes in this population of patients were consistent with recent published series regardless of whether the aneurysms were treated with microvascular surgery or endovascular surgery. There was a trend toward better outcome in a relatively small sub-group of patients presenting as Hunt and Hess grade III who were treated by the endovascular method. Guglielmi detachable coils have been available for a relatively short time, and although early results are promising, the ultimate long-term efficacy of the coils will have to be assessed.
在过去3.5年中,维也纳医科大学神经外科使用血管内技术( Guglielmi可脱性弹簧圈)或开颅夹闭动脉瘤的方法,治疗了220例动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者。进行了一项回顾性分析,以评估治疗选择是否与预后差异相关。患者按以下因素分层:1)治疗时的Hunt和Hess分级;2)治疗方法;3)治疗后2至4周的临床结局。无论动脉瘤采用微血管手术还是血管内手术治疗,该组患者的预后与近期发表的系列研究结果一致。在以Hunt和Hess III级就诊的相对较小亚组患者中,采用血管内方法治疗有预后较好的趋势。Guglielmi可脱性弹簧圈应用时间相对较短,尽管早期结果令人鼓舞,但弹簧圈的最终长期疗效仍有待评估。