Boutin Arnaud, Blandin Yannick
Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, CERCA, CNRS UMR 6234, Poitiers, France.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Oct;135(2):233-9. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
The reported study examined the cognitive processes underlying contextual interference (CI) in motor learning. This experiment was designed to assess the combined influence of practice schedule (blocked or random) and task similarity (similar or dissimilar) on acquisition and retention performance. Participants (N=60) learned a set of three variations of a timing task according to a similar (900, 1000 and 1100ms) or dissimilar parameter condition (700, 1000 and 1300ms) with either a blocked or random practice order: this resulted in 4 experimental groups. Performance in delayed retention demonstrated a typical CI effect due to the schedule of practice for the dissimilar parameter condition with the random practice group outperforming the blocked practice group. Conversely, no blocked-random difference was found for the similar parameter condition. These findings lend support for the reconstruction hypothesis by showing that supplementing random practice with additional intertask elaboration (i.e., similar parameter condition) did not facilitate subsequent retention performance.
所报道的研究考察了运动学习中情境干扰(CI)背后的认知过程。本实验旨在评估练习计划(分组练习或随机练习)和任务相似性(相似或不相似)对习得和保持表现的综合影响。参与者(N = 60)根据相似(900、1000和1100毫秒)或不相似参数条件(700、1000和1300毫秒),以分组练习或随机练习顺序学习一组计时任务的三种变体:这产生了4个实验组。由于不相似参数条件下随机练习组的练习计划,延迟保持中的表现呈现出典型的情境干扰效应,随机练习组优于分组练习组。相反,相似参数条件下未发现分组练习与随机练习的差异。这些发现通过表明用额外的任务间细化(即相似参数条件)补充随机练习并不能促进后续的保持表现,为重构假设提供了支持。