School of Health Sciences, RMIT University, Discipline of Disability Studies, P.O. Box 71, Bundoora 3083, Australia.
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Nov-Dec;31(6):1380-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.06.022. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
The aims of this study were to (1) determine the energy expenditure of adults with and without intellectual disabilities during common activities of daily living (ADL), (2) use these values to evaluate the accuracy of equivalent activity values reported in the Compendium of Physical Activities (CPA), and (3) identify ADL that may confer a health benefit for adults with intellectual disabilities when undertaken regularly. Energy expenditure was measured for adults with intellectual disabilities (N=31; 29.0±8.6 yr) and adults without intellectual disabilities (N=15; 30.4±9.6 yr) while undertaking each of seven ADL: sitting quietly (SitQ); sitting watching television (SitTV); sitting and standing while completing an assembly task (SitAT, StaAT); and walking at a slow (WalkS, 3.0 km h(-1)), quick (WalkQ, 6.0 km h(-1)) and fast (WalkF, 9.0 km h(-1)) speed, under laboratory conditions. Adults with intellectual disabilities were found to expend significantly more energy than adults without intellectual disabilities for SitQ, WalkS, WalkQ and WalkF (p<0.05). Energy expended by both populations was significantly more than CPA values for SitQ, SitTV, SitAT, WalkS, and WalkQ (p<0.02) and significantly less for WalkF (p<0.01). Walking at the speed of 3.0 km h(-1) (50 m min(-1)) was found to be sufficient to achieve moderate-intensity energy expenditure, surpassing the intensity threshold for conferring a health benefit. Energy expenditure inaccuracies of the CPA have important consequences when estimating prevalence of engagement in health enhancing physical activities among population sub-groups. The identification of slow walking as a moderate-intensity physical activity offers significant health promotion opportunities for adults with intellectual disabilities through active transport and leisure.
(1)确定有智力障碍和无智力障碍成年人在日常活动(ADL)中消耗的能量,(2)利用这些数值评估《体力活动概要》(CPA)中报告的等效活动值的准确性,(3)识别对于经常进行的 ADL,是否对有智力障碍的成年人有益健康。通过实验室条件,在 7 项 ADL 中分别对有智力障碍的成年人(N=31;29.0±8.6 岁)和无智力障碍的成年人(N=15;30.4±9.6 岁)进行能量消耗测量:安静坐姿(SitQ);安静看电视坐姿(SitTV);坐站完成组装任务(SitAT,StaAT);以及慢走(WalkS,3.0 km h(-1))、快走(WalkQ,6.0 km h(-1))和慢跑(WalkF,9.0 km h(-1))。有智力障碍的成年人在 SitQ、WalkS、WalkQ 和 WalkF 方面比无智力障碍的成年人消耗的能量显著更多(p<0.05)。两个群体的能量消耗均显著高于 CPA 中 SitQ、SitTV、SitAT、WalkS 和 WalkQ 的数值(p<0.02),显著低于 WalkF 的数值(p<0.01)。发现以 3.0 km h(-1)(50 m min(-1))的速度行走足以达到中等强度的能量消耗,超过了为健康带来益处的强度阈值。当估计人群亚组中参与促进健康的体力活动的流行率时,CPA 的能量消耗不准确会产生重要后果。确定慢走为中等强度体力活动,为有智力障碍的成年人提供了通过主动交通和休闲进行积极健康促进的机会。