Pant A C, Diaz-Montes T, Tanner E, Ahmad S, Giuntoli R L, Holloway R W, Bristow R E
The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Chemother. 2010 Aug;22(4):270-4. doi: 10.1179/joc.2010.22.4.270.
The aim of this study was to determine if in vitro extreme drug resistance (EDR) to platinum and/or taxane chemotherapy was predictive of patient response to intraperitoneal (I.P.) chemotherapy in patients with stage III or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Fifty-six patients were retrospectively identified who underwent optimal cytoreductive surgery for primary or recurrent eOC and then received at least three cycles of either intravenous (I.V.) or I.P. chemotherapy with platinum and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. EDR to platinum and/or paclitaxel was determined using a commercially available assay (Oncotech, Inc., Tustin, CA). The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS). Twenty-nine (52%) patients received I.P. chemotherapy and 27 (48%) received I.V. chemotherapy. The patients were well matched in terms of age, stage, grade and histology. Ten (35%) patients in the I.OP. arm and ten (37%) patients in the I.V. arm showed EDR to either platinum and/or paclitaxel. Median PFS for all I.P. chemotherapy patients was 23 months, compared with 13 months for those receiving I.V. chemotherapy (p = 0.04). Patients with EDR to platinum and/or taxane who underwent I.V. chemotherapy had a median PFS of 13.5 months, whereas those who underwent I.P. treatment had a median PFS of 15 months (p = 0.69). Median overall survival had not been reached at the time of analysis.No significant difference in PFS was noted between patients who underwent I.P. and those who underwent I.V. chemotherapy when EDR was predicted to either platinum or paclitaxel or both. These data suggest that the decision to offer I.P. chemotherapy, with the attendant increase in morbidity, in the setting of EDR to platinum and/or taxane chemotherapy, may not be beneficial. Prospective studies, preferably analyzing platinum or taxane EDR individually, are required to validate these observations.
本研究的目的是确定对于铂类和/或紫杉烷化疗的体外极端耐药性(EDR)是否可预测III期或复发性上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者对腹腔内(I.P.)化疗的反应。回顾性纳入了56例接受了原发性或复发性EOC最佳细胞减灭术的患者,这些患者随后接受了至少三个周期的基于铂类和紫杉醇的静脉内(I.V.)或腹腔内化疗。使用市售检测方法(Oncotech公司,加利福尼亚州图斯廷)测定对铂类和/或紫杉醇的EDR。主要结局指标为无进展生存期(PFS)。29例(52%)患者接受了腹腔内化疗,27例(48%)接受了静脉内化疗。患者在年龄、分期、分级和组织学方面匹配良好。腹腔内化疗组有10例(35%)患者,静脉内化疗组有10例(37%)患者显示对铂类和/或紫杉醇有EDR。所有腹腔内化疗患者的中位PFS为23个月,而接受静脉内化疗的患者为13个月(p = 0.04)。对铂类和/或紫杉烷有EDR且接受静脉内化疗的患者中位PFS为13.5个月,而接受腹腔内治疗的患者中位PFS为15个月(p = 0.69)。分析时总体生存期的中位数尚未达到。当预测对铂类或紫杉醇或两者有EDR时,接受腹腔内化疗和接受静脉内化疗的患者在PFS方面未观察到显著差异。这些数据表明,在对铂类和/或紫杉烷化疗有EDR的情况下,决定给予腹腔内化疗(随之而来的发病率增加)可能并无益处。需要进行前瞻性研究,最好单独分析铂类或紫杉烷EDR,以验证这些观察结果。