Holloway Robert W, Mehta Rita S, Finkler Neil J, Li Kuo-Tung, McLaren Christine E, Parker Ricardo J, Fruehauf John P
Walt Disney Memorial Cancer Institute at Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL 32804, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2002 Oct;87(1):8-16. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6797.
The initial clinical response to platinum is a major determinant of outcome for patients with ovarian cancer. This retrospective study was undertaken to correlate the response and survival of newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer patients who received platinum-based therapy with in vitro drug response to cisplatin or carboplatin measured as percentage cell inhibition (PCI) in the in vitro Extreme Drug Resistance (EDR) assay.
Outcomes for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients with tumor specimens submitted in a serial fashion for the EDR assay were studied. EDR assay results for cisplatin and carboplatin were correlated with clinical outcome for 79 evaluable chemotherapy nai;ve cases who presented with advanced (stages IIC, III, and IV) ovarian cancer. Stage IV and suboptimally debulked stage IIIc accounted for 16 cases, while 63 cases were optimally debulked Stage III/IIc. All patients were treated with platinum-based combination chemotherapy at a single institution. In vitro results for patient tumors were classified as low drug resistance (PCI > median), intermediate drug resistance [PCI between the median and 1 standard deviation (SD) below the median], or extreme drug resistance (PCI more than 1 SD below the median). For the purpose of this analysis, in vitro EDR to either cisplatin or carboplatin was considered to represent extreme resistance to platinum (EDRP), while the absence of EDR to either cisplatin or carboplatin was considered to represent low resistance to platinum (LDRP). Patients demonstrating relative in vitro resistance to paclitaxel and non-cross-resistance to cyclophosphamide and/or doxorubicin received cyclophosphamide plus platinum (CP); cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and platinum (CAP); or platinum alone in place of paclitaxel plus platinum (TP). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were correlated with EDR assay results.
Median PFS was 6 months for the 17 cases exhibiting EDRP, compared to 24 months for the 62 cases exhibiting LDRP in vitro [relative risk (RR) 3.78, confidence intervals (CI) 1.82-7.83], adjusted for stage, debulking status, in vitro response to 3-OH-cyclophosphamide, and histological grade. Estimated overall 5-year survival was 19% for patients with tumors showing EDRP, compared to 68% for patients with tumors showing LDRP (RR 2.32, CI 1.06-5.07). Patients treated with CP (n = 20) showed no significant difference in OS compared to patients treated with TP (n = 54), CAP (n = 4), or cisplatin (n = 1) alone. In vitro platinum response remained an independent predictor of PFS and OS in multivariate analyses adjusted for CP versus TP, CAP, or platinum administration, and adjusted for debulking status. Median PFS for all 79 patients was 22 months, with an estimated 5-year survival of 57%.
Patients with tumors demonstrating in vitro EDR to platinum were at significantly increased risk for progression and death when treated with standard platinum-based regimens. Such patients may therefore benefit from entry onto trials with novel agents or combinations.
铂类药物的初始临床反应是卵巢癌患者预后的主要决定因素。本回顾性研究旨在将接受铂类治疗的新诊断晚期卵巢癌患者的反应和生存情况,与体外药物对顺铂或卡铂的反应相关联,体外药物反应通过体外极端耐药性(EDR)试验中的细胞抑制百分比(PCI)来衡量。
对新诊断的卵巢癌患者的肿瘤标本进行连续送检以进行EDR试验,并研究其结果。顺铂和卡铂的EDR试验结果与79例可评估的初治化疗患者的临床结果相关,这些患者均为晚期(IIc期、III期和IV期)卵巢癌。IV期和减瘤不充分的IIIc期患者有16例,而63例为减瘤充分的III/IIc期患者。所有患者均在单一机构接受铂类联合化疗。患者肿瘤的体外试验结果分为低耐药(PCI>中位数)、中度耐药[PCI在中位数和低于中位数1个标准差(SD)之间]或极端耐药(PCI低于中位数超过1个SD)。为进行本分析,对顺铂或卡铂的体外EDR被视为对铂类的极端耐药(EDRP),而对顺铂或卡铂均无EDR则被视为对铂类的低耐药(LDRP)。对紫杉醇表现出相对体外耐药且对环磷酰胺和/或阿霉素无交叉耐药的患者接受环磷酰胺加铂(CP)、环磷酰胺、阿霉素和铂(CAP)或单独使用铂来替代紫杉醇加铂(TP)。无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)与EDR试验结果相关。
17例表现出EDRP的患者的中位PFS为6个月,而62例体外表现出LDRP的患者为24个月[相对风险(RR)3.78,置信区间(CI)1.82 - 7.83],对分期、减瘤状态、对3 - OH - 环磷酰胺的体外反应和组织学分级进行了校正。肿瘤表现出EDRP的患者的估计5年总生存率为19%,而肿瘤表现出LDRP的患者为68%(RR 2.32,CI 1.06 - 5.07)。接受CP治疗的患者(n = 20)与接受TP治疗的患者(n = 54)、CAP治疗的患者(n = 4)或单独接受顺铂治疗的患者(n = 1)相比,OS无显著差异。在针对CP与TP、CAP或铂类给药进行校正以及针对减瘤状态进行校正的多变量分析中,体外铂类反应仍然是PFS和OS的独立预测因素。79例患者的中位PFS为22个月,估计5年生存率为57%。
肿瘤在体外对铂类表现出EDR的患者,在接受标准铂类方案治疗时,疾病进展和死亡风险显著增加。因此,这类患者可能会从参加新型药物或联合方案的试验中获益。