Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Boterhoeksestraat 48, 6666 Heteren, The Netherlands.
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jan 7;278(1702):2-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1272. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
When previously isolated populations meet and mix, the resulting admixed population can benefit from several genetic advantages, including increased genetic variation, the creation of novel genotypes and the masking of deleterious mutations. These admixture benefits are thought to play an important role in biological invasions. In contrast, populations in their native range often remain differentiated and frequently suffer from inbreeding depression owing to isolation. While the advantages of admixture are evident for introduced populations that experienced recent bottlenecks or that face novel selection pressures, it is less obvious why native range populations do not similarly benefit from admixture. Here we argue that a temporary loss of local adaptation in recent invaders fundamentally alters the fitness consequences of admixture. In native populations, selection against dilution of the locally adapted gene pool inhibits unconstrained admixture and reinforces population isolation, with some level of inbreeding depression as an expected consequence. We show that admixture is selected against despite significant inbreeding depression because the benefits of local adaptation are greater than the cost of inbreeding. In contrast, introduced populations that have not yet established a pattern of local adaptation can freely reap the benefits of admixture. There can be strong selection for admixture because it instantly lifts the inbreeding depression that had built up in isolated parental populations. Recent work in Silene suggests that reduced inbreeding depression associated with post-introduction admixture may contribute to enhanced fitness of invasive populations. We hypothesize that in locally adapted populations, the benefits of local adaptation are balanced against an inbreeding cost that could develop in part owing to the isolating effect of local adaptation itself. The inbreeding cost can be revealed in admixing populations during recent invasions.
当以前隔离的种群相遇和混合时,由此产生的混合种群可以受益于几种遗传优势,包括增加遗传变异、创造新的基因型和掩盖有害突变。这些混合优势被认为在生物入侵中起着重要作用。相比之下,在其自然栖息地的种群通常仍然存在分化,并且由于隔离而经常遭受近交衰退。虽然引入种群经历了最近的瓶颈或面临新的选择压力,混合的优势是明显的,但为什么自然栖息地的种群不能从混合中同样受益,这一点就不太明显了。在这里,我们认为,最近入侵物种中局部适应性的暂时丧失从根本上改变了混合的适应后果。在本地种群中,对局部适应基因库稀释的选择抑制了不受限制的混合,并加强了种群隔离,随之而来的是一定程度的近交衰退。我们表明,尽管近交衰退严重,但混合仍然受到选择的排斥,因为局部适应性的好处大于近交的代价。相比之下,尚未建立局部适应模式的引入种群可以自由地从混合中受益。混合可能会受到强烈的选择,因为它可以立即消除在孤立的亲本种群中积累的近交衰退。最近在 Silene 中的研究表明,与引入后混合相关的近交衰退减少可能有助于提高入侵种群的适应性。我们假设,在局部适应的种群中,局部适应的好处与近交成本相平衡,而近交成本可能部分是由于局部适应本身的隔离作用而发展起来的。在最近的入侵中,在混合种群中可以发现近交成本。