Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Aug 4;92(9):1827-33. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00871.
The decision whether to treat benign skeletal lesions surgically can be difficult to make. The purpose of this study was to validate our previously published method of predicting fracture risk with use of quantitative computed tomography-based structural analysis.
We prospectively studied a group of children who presented to a major children's hospital with a benign appendicular skeletal lesion between 2002 and 2007. As in our previous study, the resistance of the affected bone to compressive, bending, and torsional loads was calculated with rigidity analysis performed with the use of serial transaxial quantitative computed tomography data obtained along the length of the bone containing the lesion and from homologous cross sections through the contralateral, normal bone. At each cross section, the ratio of the structural rigidity of the affected bone to that of the normal, contralateral bone was determined.
Forty-one patients who had not received surgical treatment for the skeletal lesion met the criteria for our study. Thirty-four (83%) of these individuals completed our activity questionnaire at least two years after the quantitative computed tomography-based rigidity analysis. None of the patients for whom no increased fracture risk had been predicted by the rigidity analysis sustained a fracture, even though they had not received surgical treatment.
Many considerations other than the predicted fracture risk are factored into the decision of whether to treat a benign skeletal lesion. However, this study indicated that quantitative computed tomography-based rigidity analysis is more specific (97% specificity) than criteria based on plain radiographs (12% specificity) for predicting the risk of a pathologic fracture since fracture risk indices based on lesion size alone fail to account for the compensatory remodeling of the host bone that occurs in response to the presence of the lesion in a growing child.
Prognostic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
是否选择对良性骨病变进行手术治疗可能存在困难。本研究旨在验证我们先前发表的使用基于定量 CT 的结构分析预测骨折风险的方法。
我们前瞻性地研究了一组于 2002 年至 2007 年间在一家主要儿童医院因良性四肢骨病变就诊的儿童患者。与我们先前的研究一样,通过对包含病变的骨和对侧正常骨的全长进行的系列轴位定量 CT 数据进行刚性分析,计算出病变骨对压缩、弯曲和扭转负荷的阻力。在每个截面处,测量病变骨的结构刚性与对侧正常骨的刚性的比值。
41 例未接受手术治疗的骨骼病变患者符合本研究标准。34 例(83%)患者在接受基于定量 CT 的刚性分析后至少 2 年完成了我们的活动问卷。在预测为无增加骨折风险的患者中,没有任何患者发生骨折,尽管他们没有接受手术治疗。
在决定是否治疗良性骨骼病变时,除了预测骨折风险外,还需要考虑许多其他因素。但是,本研究表明,与基于平片的标准(特异性 12%)相比,基于定量 CT 的刚性分析对预测病理性骨折风险更具有特异性(特异性 97%),因为基于病变大小的骨折风险指数不能反映生长中的儿童骨骼中存在病变时发生的宿主骨代偿性重塑。
预后水平 I。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者须知。