Suppr超能文献

骨盆骨折固定术后常规行计算机断层扫描检查:有必要还是奢侈?

Routine Postoperative Computed Tomography Scans After Pelvic Fracture Fixation: A Necessity or a Luxury?

机构信息

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cairo University, Giza Governorate, Egypt.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Feb;32 Suppl 1:S66-S71. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001092.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus regarding the postoperative radiology imaging protocol after pelvic fracture surgery. Some institutes routinely scan all patients after their surgery, others do not. The aim of this study was to assess the value of routine use of computed tomography (CT) scans after pelvic fracture surgery and to determine the sensitivity of conventional plain radiographs and intraoperative fluoroscopy in detecting metalwork malposition.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The radiographs and clinical notes of patients undergoing pelvic fracture surgery in the period between January 2010 and December 2015 were reviewed. Patients were categorized into 2 main groups: group A-patients whose fixation entailed the use of a sacroiliac (SI) screws and group B-patients whose fixation did not require an SI screw. Furthermore, the patients were classified according to the position of metalwork in their postoperative plain radiographs and perioperative fluoroscopy into 3 groups: (1) Safe: When there was no suspicion of metalwork malposition. (2) Suspicious: When there was some suspicion of malposition but radiographs were inconclusive. (3) Definite: When plain imaging showed a definite malposition.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-eight patients were included in this study (161 in group A and 37 in group B). In group A, 148 (92%) were classified as safe, 10 were suspicious (6%), and 3 (2%) showed definite malposition. Of the fractures that were believed to be safe on plain radiographs, 78% were confirmed to be safe on CT scans, whereas 22% showed malpositioned metalwork, and 7 patients (4%) required a revision surgery. Plain radiographs showed a sensitivity of 27% in detecting metalwork malposition and a specificity of 99%. Increasing the number of screws significantly increased the risk of malposition and reoperation (P = 0.006 and 0.002 respectively). The plain images of group B were all classified as safe. The CT scans detected 2 cases with long metalwork protruding into the soft tissues, none of which required a revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative fluoroscopy and plain postoperative radiographs have a low sensitivity in detecting the metalwork malposition after pelvic fracture surgery. We recommend the use of routine postoperative CT scans in patients whose fixation entails the use of SI screws. In this series, routine scanning of patients who did not have SI screws added no significant clinical value.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV Diagnostic. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

简介

骨盆骨折手术后的影像学检查方案尚无共识。一些机构常规对所有患者进行术后扫描,而另一些机构则不进行。本研究旨在评估骨盆骨折手术后常规使用计算机断层扫描(CT)的价值,并确定常规平片和术中透视在检测金属植入物位置不良方面的敏感性。

患者和方法

回顾了 2010 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间接受骨盆骨折手术的患者的影像学资料和临床记录。患者分为 2 个主要组:A 组-使用骶髂(SI)螺钉固定的患者;B 组-不需要 SI 螺钉固定的患者。此外,根据患者术后平片和围手术期透视的金属位置将患者分为 3 组:(1)安全:当没有金属植入物位置不良的怀疑时。(2)可疑:当存在一些位置不良的怀疑,但平片结果不确定时。(3)明确:当平片显示明确的位置不良时。

结果

本研究共纳入 198 例患者(A 组 161 例,B 组 37 例)。在 A 组中,148 例(92%)被归类为安全,10 例可疑(6%),3 例(2%)明确为位置不良。在平片上认为安全的骨折中,78%在 CT 扫描上也被证实为安全,而 22%显示金属植入物位置不良,7 例(4%)需要进行翻修手术。平片显示金属植入物位置不良的敏感性为 27%,特异性为 99%。增加螺钉数量显著增加了位置不良和再次手术的风险(P = 0.006 和 0.002)。B 组的平片均被归类为安全。CT 扫描发现 2 例长金属植入物突入软组织,均无需翻修。

结论

骨盆骨折手术后,围手术期透视和术后平片检测金属植入物位置不良的敏感性较低。我们建议在使用骶髂螺钉固定的患者中常规进行术后 CT 扫描。在本系列中,对未使用骶髂螺钉的患者进行常规扫描并没有增加显著的临床价值。

证据水平

IV 级诊断。请参阅作者须知,以获取完整的证据水平描述。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验