Polcin Douglas L, Galloway Gantt P, Bond Jason, Korcha Rachael, Greenfield Thomas K
Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute 6475 Christie Avenue, Suite 400 Emeryville, CA 94608-1010 Telephone (510) 597-3440 Fax (510) 985-6459 E-Mail:
J Drug Issues. 2009 Sep;39(4):931-948. doi: 10.1177/002204260903900408.
The addiction field lacks an accepted definition and reliable measure of confrontation. The Alcohol and Drug Confrontation Scale (ADCS) defines confrontation as warnings about the potential consequences of substance use. To assess psychometric properties, 323 individual entering recovery houses in U.S. urban and suburban areas were interviewed between 2003 and 2005 (20% women, 68% white). Analyses included test-retest reliability, confirmatory factor analysis, and measures of internal consistency. Findings support the ADCS as a reliable way of assessing two factors: Internal Support and External intensity. Confrontation was experienced as supportive, accurate and helpful. Additional studies should assess confrontation in different contexts.
成瘾领域缺乏对抗的公认定义和可靠衡量标准。酒精与药物对抗量表(ADCS)将对抗定义为对物质使用潜在后果的警告。为评估心理测量特性,2003年至2005年间对美国城市和郊区进入康复之家的323名个体进行了访谈(20%为女性,68%为白人)。分析包括重测信度、验证性因素分析和内部一致性测量。研究结果支持ADCS作为评估两个因素的可靠方法:内部支持和外部强度。对抗被认为是支持性的、准确的且有帮助的。更多研究应评估不同背景下的对抗情况。