Chen Ning, Zhou Muke, Yang Mi, Guo Jian, Zhu Cairong, Yang Jie, Wang Yucai, Yang Xue, He Li
Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Wai Nan Guo Xue Xiang #37, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Aug 4(8):CD003654. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003654.pub4.
Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are a relatively new antihypertensive class. The effect of first-line CCBs on the prevention of cardiovascular events, as compared with other antihypertensive drug classes, is unknown.
To determine whether CCBs used as first-line therapy for hypertension are different from other first-line drug classes in reducing the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events.
Electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASEand the WHO-ISH Collaboration Register (up to May 2009) were performed. We also checked the references of published studies to identify additional trials.
Randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing first-line CCBs with other antihypertensive classes, with at least 100 randomized hypertensive participants and with a follow-up of at least two years.
Two authors independently selected the included trials, evaluated the risk of bias and entered the data for analysis.
Eighteen RCTs (14 dihydropyridines, 4 non-dihydropyridines) with a total of 141,807 participants were included. All-cause mortality was not different between first-line CCBs and any other first-line antihypertensive classes. CCBs reduced the following outcomes as compared to beta-blockers: total cardiovascular events (RR 0.84, 95% CI [0.77, 0.92]), stroke (RR 0.77, 95% CI [0.67, 0.88]) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI [0.81, 0.99]). CCBs increased total cardiovascular events (RR 1.05 , 95% CI [1.00, 1.09], p = 0.03) and congestive heart failure events (RR 1.37, 95% CI [1.25, 1.51]) as compared to diuretics. CCBs reduced stroke (RR 0.89, 95% CI [0.80, 0.98]) as compared to ACE inhibitors and reduced stroke (RR 0.85, 95% CI [0.73, 0.99]) and MI (RR 0.83, 95% CI [0.72, 0.96]) as compared to ARBs. CCBs also increased congestive heart failure events as compared to ACE inhibitors (RR 1.16, 95% CI [1.06, 1.27]) and ARBs (RR 1.20, 95% CI [1.06, 1.36]). The other evaluated outcomes were not significantly different.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Diuretics are preferred first-line over CCBs to optimize reduction of cardiovascular events. The review does not distinguish between CCBs, ACE inhibitors or ARBs, but does provide evidence supporting the use of CCBs over beta-blockers. Many of the differences found in the current review are not robust and further trials might change the conclusions. More well-designed RCTs studying the mortality and morbidity of patients taking CCBs as compared with other antihypertensive drug classes are needed for patients with different stages of hypertension, different ages, and with different co-morbidities such as diabetes.
钙通道阻滞剂(CCB)是一类相对较新的抗高血压药物。与其他抗高血压药物类别相比,一线CCB对预防心血管事件的效果尚不清楚。
确定作为高血压一线治疗药物的CCB在降低主要不良心血管事件发生率方面是否与其他一线药物类别不同。
对Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE和世界卫生组织-国际高血压学会协作注册库(截至2009年5月)进行了电子检索。我们还查阅了已发表研究的参考文献以识别其他试验。
随机对照试验(RCT),比较一线CCB与其他抗高血压药物类别,至少有100名随机分组的高血压参与者,随访至少两年。
两位作者独立选择纳入试验,评估偏倚风险并录入数据进行分析。
纳入了18项RCT(14项二氢吡啶类,4项非二氢吡啶类),共141,807名参与者。一线CCB与任何其他一线抗高血压药物类别之间的全因死亡率无差异。与β受体阻滞剂相比,CCB降低了以下结局:总心血管事件(风险比[RR]0.84,95%置信区间[CI][0.77, 0.92])、中风(RR 0.77,95% CI[0.67, 0.88])和心血管死亡率(RR 0.90,95% CI[0.81, 0.99])。与利尿剂相比,CCB增加了总心血管事件(RR 1.05,95% CI[1.00, 1.09];p = 0.03)和充血性心力衰竭事件(RR 1.37,95% CI[1.25, 1.51])。与血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂相比,CCB降低了中风(RR 0.89, 95% CI[0.80, 0.98]);与血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂(ARB)相比,CCB降低了中风(RR 0.85,95% CI[0.73, 0.99])和心肌梗死(RR 0.83,95% CI[0.72, 0.96])。与ACE抑制剂(RR 1.16,95% CI[1.06, 1.27])和ARB(RR 1.20,95% CI[1.06, 1.36])相比CCB也增加了充血性心力衰竭事件。其他评估结局无显著差异。
为优化心血管事件的降低,利尿剂作为一线药物优于CCB。本综述未区分CCB、ACE抑制剂或ARB,但确实提供了支持CCB优于β受体阻滞剂的证据。当前综述中发现的许多差异并不确凿,进一步的试验可能会改变结论。需要更多设计良好的RCT来研究不同高血压阶段、不同年龄以及患有不同合并症(如糖尿病)的患者服用CCB与其他抗高血压药物类别的死亡率和发病率。