Department of Urology, Research Division, University Hospital Charité, Schumannstr. 20/21, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Clin Chim Acta. 2010 Nov 11;411(21-22):1611-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.07.032. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has been suggested as a cancer biomarker. Several studies assessed the usefulness of quantitative and qualitative tumor-specific alterations of cfDNA, such as DNA strand integrity, frequency of mutations, abnormalities of microsatellites, and methylation of genes, as diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring markers in cancer patients. Most of the papers that could be evaluated in this review resulted in a positive conclusion. However, methodical diversity without the traceability of data and differently designed and often underpowered studies resulted in divergent results between studies. In addition, the limited diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of cfDNA alterations temper the effusive hope of novel tumor markers, raising similar issues as those for other tumor markers. To validate the actual clinical validity of various cfDNA alterations as potential cancer biomarkers in practice for individual tumor types, the main problems of the observed uncertainties must be considered in future studies. These include methodical harmonization concerning sample collection, processing, and analysis with the traceability of measurement results as well as the realization of well-designed prospective studies based on power analysis and sample size calculations.
循环无细胞 DNA(cfDNA)已被认为是一种癌症生物标志物。多项研究评估了 cfDNA 的定量和定性肿瘤特异性改变的有用性,例如 DNA 链完整性、突变频率、微卫星异常和基因甲基化,作为癌症患者的诊断、预后和监测标志物。在本综述中可以评估的大多数论文得出了积极的结论。然而,方法上的多样性、数据的不可追溯性以及设计不同且往往功率不足的研究导致了研究之间的结果不一致。此外,cfDNA 改变的有限诊断灵敏度和特异性降低了对新型肿瘤标志物的热切期望,引发了与其他肿瘤标志物类似的问题。为了在实践中验证各种 cfDNA 改变作为潜在癌症生物标志物的实际临床有效性,未来的研究必须考虑到观察到的不确定性的主要问题。这些问题包括关于样本采集、处理和分析的方法学协调,以及测量结果的可追溯性,以及基于功率分析和样本量计算的精心设计的前瞻性研究的实现。