Department of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Trends Biotechnol. 2010 Oct;28(10):509-16. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
Regulatory guidance stipulates that comparability assessment is required to support manufacturing process changes during the development of a biological product or post-approval. However, strategies for assessing the comparability of pre- and post-change materials are still evolving. A hierarchical risk-based approach is recommended, starting with analytical testing to ensure quality, followed by biological characterization and, if needed, in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK), PK-pharmacodynamic (PD), safety and/or efficacy studies. The need for an in vivo study and the type of study required depend on the magnitude and the potential impact of the changes and the timing in the development process. This review discusses factors affecting the PK, PD and immunogenicity of monoclonal antibodies, and provides guidance for determining non-clinical and clinical comparability assessment strategies.
监管指南规定,在生物制品的开发或批准后,需要进行可比性评估以支持制造工艺的变更。然而,评估变更前后材料可比性的策略仍在不断发展。建议采用分层基于风险的方法,首先进行分析测试以确保质量,然后进行生物学特征分析,如果需要,还可以进行体内药代动力学(PK)、PK-药效学(PD)、安全性和/或疗效研究。是否需要进行体内研究以及所需研究的类型取决于变更的幅度和潜在影响以及在开发过程中的时间。本文讨论了影响单克隆抗体 PK、PD 和免疫原性的因素,并为确定非临床和临床可比性评估策略提供了指导。