Geers A E, Moog J S
Central Institute for the Deaf, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Am J Otol. 1991;12 Suppl:116-25.
The material presented here summarizes the first year of a study to determine whether cochlear implants, tactile aids, acoustic hearing aids, or some combination of these are best for developing spoken language in prelingual profoundly deaf children. The effects of each device over and above the gains normally achieved as a result of oral instruction are examined. Each group contains three matched children, one fitted with each device, who are enrolled in the Central Institute for the Deaf (CID) school for 3 years of evaluation and training. This report describes results obtained from four groups of matched subjects during their first year in the study. These subjects improved in all areas evaluated, regardless of the device used. However, the implanted subjects exhibited a greater rate of progress in acquiring auditory speech perception skills. They exhibited no advantage in acquiring speech production skills and spoken language skills during their first year with the device. The subtle advantages provided by the implant may become apparent in spoken language development when 2- and 3-year post-test results are examined.
此处呈现的材料总结了一项研究的第一年情况,该研究旨在确定人工耳蜗、触觉辅助设备、助听器,或这些设备的某种组合,是否最有利于语前极重度失聪儿童发展口语。研究考察了每种设备在通常通过口语教学所取得进步之外的效果。每组包含三名匹配的儿童,每人佩戴一种设备,他们就读于中央聋人研究所(CID)学校,接受为期三年的评估和训练。本报告描述了四组匹配受试者在研究第一年所取得的结果。无论使用何种设备,这些受试者在所有评估领域均有进步。然而,接受植入的受试者在获得听觉言语感知技能方面进步速度更快。在使用该设备的第一年,他们在获得言语产出技能和口语技能方面没有优势。当检查两年和三年后的测试结果时,植入设备所带来的细微优势可能在口语发展中变得明显。