• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重 COPD 运动试验的最小有意义差异。

The minimal important difference of exercise tests in severe COPD.

机构信息

Dept of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 2011 Apr;37(4):784-90. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00063810. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1183/09031936.00063810
PMID:20693247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5516638/
Abstract

Our aim was to determine the minimal important difference (MID) for 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and maximal cycle exercise capacity (MCEC) in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). 1,218 patients enrolled in the National Emphysema Treatment Trial completed exercise tests before and after 4-6 weeks of pre-trial rehabilitation, and 6 months after randomisation to surgery or medical care. The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (domain and total scores) and University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (total score) served as anchors for anchor-based MID estimates. In order to calculate distribution-based estimates, we used the standard error of measurement, Cohen's effect size and the empirical rule effect size. Anchor-based estimates for the 6MWD were 18.9 m (95% CI 18.1-20.1 m), 24.2 m (95% CI 23.4-25.4 m), 24.6 m (95% CI 23.4-25.7 m) and 26.4 m (95% CI 25.4-27.4 m), which were similar to distribution-based MID estimates of 25.7, 26.8 and 30.6 m. For MCEC, anchor-based estimates for the MID were 2.2 W (95% CI 2.0-2.4 W), 3.2 W (95% CI 3.0-3.4 W), 3.2 W (95% CI 3.0-3.4 W) and 3.3 W (95% CI 3.0-3.5 W), while distribution-based estimates were 5.3 and 5.5 W. We suggest a MID of 26 ± 2 m for 6MWD and 4 ± 1 W for MCEC for patients with severe COPD.

摘要

我们的目的是确定严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者 6 分钟步行距离(6MWD)和最大循环运动能力(MCEC)的最小有意义差异(MID)。1218 名参加国家肺气肿治疗试验的患者在术前康复 4-6 周前后以及随机分配至手术或医疗护理后 6 个月完成了运动测试。圣乔治呼吸问卷(领域和总分)和加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥短气问卷(总分)作为锚定基于锚的 MID 估计的依据。为了计算基于分布的估计,我们使用测量的标准误差、Cohen 的效应大小和经验法则效应大小。6MWD 的基于锚的估计值为 18.9m(95%CI18.1-20.1m)、24.2m(95%CI23.4-25.4m)、24.6m(95%CI23.4-25.7m)和 26.4m(95%CI25.4-27.4m),与基于分布的 MID 估计值 25.7、26.8 和 30.6m 相似。对于 MCEC,MID 的基于锚的估计值为 2.2W(95%CI2.0-2.4W)、3.2W(95%CI3.0-3.4W)、3.2W(95%CI3.0-3.4W)和 3.3W(95%CI3.0-3.5W),而基于分布的估计值为 5.3 和 5.5W。我们建议严重 COPD 患者的 6MWD 的 MID 为 26±2m,MCEC 的 MID 为 4±1W。

相似文献

1
The minimal important difference of exercise tests in severe COPD.严重 COPD 运动试验的最小有意义差异。
Eur Respir J. 2011 Apr;37(4):784-90. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00063810. Epub 2010 Aug 6.
2
Changes in the endurance shuttle walk test in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure after pulmonary rehabilitation: the minimal important difference obtained with anchor- and distribution-based method.慢性呼吸衰竭的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者肺康复后耐力穿梭步行试验的变化:基于锚定法和分布法获得的最小重要差异
Respir Res. 2015 Feb 19;16(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12931-015-0182-x.
3
The minimal important difference of the pulmonary functional status and dyspnea questionnaire in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺功能状态与呼吸困难问卷的最小重要差异
Respir Res. 2013 May 25;14(1):58. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-14-58.
4
Minimal important difference and responsiveness of 2-minute walk test performance in people with COPD undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者接受肺康复治疗时2分钟步行试验表现的最小重要差异和反应性
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Oct 9;12:2849-2857. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S143179. eCollection 2017.
5
The minimal important difference for the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with severe COPD.严重 COPD 患者圣乔治呼吸问卷的最小重要差异。
Eur Respir J. 2015 Dec;46(6):1598-604. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00535-2015. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
6
Updating the minimal important difference for six-minute walk distance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.更新慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者六分钟步行距离的最小有意义差异。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Feb;91(2):221-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.017.
7
Interpretation of treatment changes in 6-minute walk distance in patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者6分钟步行距离治疗变化的解读
Eur Respir J. 2008 Sep;32(3):637-43. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00140507. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
8
Sustained effects of integrated COPD management on health status and exercise capacity in primary care patients.综合 COPD 管理对初级保健患者健康状况和运动能力的持续影响。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2010 Nov 25;5:407-13. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S9654.
9
Six-minute-walk test in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: minimal clinically important difference for death or hospitalization.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的 6 分钟步行试验:死亡或住院的最小临床重要差异。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb 15;187(4):382-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201209-1596OC. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
10
Is the 1-minute sit-to-stand test a good tool for the evaluation of the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation? Determination of the minimal important difference in COPD.1分钟坐立试验是评估肺康复效果的良好工具吗?慢性阻塞性肺疾病最小重要差异的确定。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Oct 19;11:2609-2616. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S115439. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining the minimum important differences for field walking tests in adults with long-term conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.确定长期患病成人现场步行测试的最小重要差异:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Respir Rev. 2025 May 28;34(176). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0198-2024. Print 2025 Apr.
2
Minimum important difference of shuttle walk tests in patients with interstitial lung disease following pulmonary rehabilitation.肺康复后间质性肺疾病患者穿梭步行试验的最小重要差异
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Apr 22;11(2). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00601-2024. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-Complemented Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Lung Function, Exercise Capacity, Dyspnea, and Health Status in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.虚拟现实辅助肺康复对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺功能、运动能力、呼吸困难及健康状况的有效性:系统评价与Meta分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 7;27:e64742. doi: 10.2196/64742.
4
Clinical improvements after endoscopic lung volume reduction with valves in patients with advanced emphysema and a 6-min walk test ≤140 m at baseline.晚期肺气肿且基线6分钟步行试验≤140米的患者经内镜下瓣膜肺减容术后的临床改善情况。
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Jan 13;11(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00410-2024. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
Outcome and safety 90 days after combined airway valve treatment of the right upper and middle lobes in patients with severe pulmonary emphysema.重度肺气肿患者右上叶和中叶联合气道瓣膜治疗90天后的疗效与安全性
Respir Res. 2025 Jan 6;26(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03069-6.
6
Widening the selection criteria for lung volume reduction surgery.扩大肺减容手术的选择标准。
Eur Respir J. 2025 Jan 16;65(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00829-2024. Print 2025 Jan.
7
Clinically important changes and adverse events with centre-based or home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic respiratory disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.以中心或家庭为基础的肺康复治疗慢性呼吸系统疾病的临床重要变化和不良事件:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chron Respir Dis. 2024 Jan-Dec;21:14799731241277808. doi: 10.1177/14799731241277808.
8
Comparison of a Supervised Home-Based Tele-Rehabilitation with Center-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Protocol for a Randomized Non-Inferiority Multicenter Study in Ningxia.基于监督的家庭远程康复与中心式肺康复的比较:宁夏一项随机非劣效性多中心研究方案。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024 Jul 25;19:1707-1719. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S467945. eCollection 2024.
9
Increasing exercise capacity and physical activity in the COPD patient.提高慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的运动能力和身体活动水平。
Breathe (Sheff). 2024 Jun 11;20(2):230347. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0347-2023. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the 6-minute walk distance in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.接受结直肠癌手术患者的 6 分钟步行距离的反应性和最小临床重要差异。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 May 25;32(6):382. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08596-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Expansion of the prognostic assessment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the updated BODE index and the ADO index.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者预后评估的扩展:更新后的BODE指数和ADO指数。
Lancet. 2009 Aug 29;374(9691):704-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61301-5.
2
The minimal important difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者医院焦虑抑郁量表的最小重要差异
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008 Jul 2;6:46. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-6-46.
3
Interpretation of treatment changes in 6-minute walk distance in patients with COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者6分钟步行距离治疗变化的解读
Eur Respir J. 2008 Sep;32(3):637-43. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00140507. Epub 2008 Jun 11.
4
Effectiveness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-management programs: systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性阻塞性肺疾病管理项目的有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Med. 2008 May;121(5):433-443.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.02.009.
5
Maximum exercise as an outcome in COPD: minimal clinically important difference.以最大运动能力作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病的一项结局指标:最小临床重要差异
COPD. 2005 Mar;2(1):137-41. doi: 10.1081/copd-200051358.
6
Minimal clinically important differences in the six-minute walk test and the incremental shuttle walking test.六分钟步行试验和递增穿梭步行试验中最小临床重要差异
COPD. 2005 Mar;2(1):125-9. doi: 10.1081/copd-200050527.
7
Minimally clinically important difference for the UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, Borg Scale, and Visual Analog Scale.加州大学圣地亚哥分校呼吸急促问卷、博格量表和视觉模拟量表的最小临床重要差异。
COPD. 2005 Mar;2(1):105-10. doi: 10.1081/copd-200050655.
8
Responsiveness and minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes.患者报告结局的反应性和最小重要差异
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Sep 27;4:70. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-4-70.
9
Relative responsiveness of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, St. Georges Respiratory Questionnaire and four other health-related quality of life instruments for patients with chronic lung disease.慢性呼吸问卷、圣乔治呼吸问卷及其他四种与健康相关的生活质量量表对慢性肺病患者的相对反应性。
Respir Med. 2007 Feb;101(2):308-16. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.04.023. Epub 2006 Jun 19.
10
Quantifying physical activity in daily life with questionnaires and motion sensors in COPD.使用问卷和运动传感器对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的日常生活身体活动进行量化。
Eur Respir J. 2006 May;27(5):1040-55. doi: 10.1183/09031936.06.00064105.