Suppr超能文献

健康成年志愿者中ERS标准柠檬酸咳嗽激发试验的验证

Validation of the ERS standard citric acid cough challenge in healthy adult volunteers.

作者信息

Wright Caroline E, Jackson Jennifer, Thompson Rachel L, Morice Alyn H

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Studies, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham, UK.

出版信息

Cough. 2010 Aug 10;6:8. doi: 10.1186/1745-9974-6-8.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Protocols measuring cough sensitivity can vary in terms of nebuliser, tussive agent, single and dose response. A definitive method for measuring cough sensitivity needs to be established.The ERS guidelines recommend the KoKo DigiDoser (KD) delivery system. Study aim, was to compare the reproducibility of this citric acid (CA) cough challenge and previously established Mefar dosimeter (MD) protocol.39 (female 26) volunteers mean age (40.4 yrs) were randomised to either KD or MD. Intra-day and inter-day reproducibility was compared.We calculated the concentration of citric acid evoking 2 coughs (C2).The geometric mean C2 (95%CI) was similar for both KD and MD, of 263 (200,339) mM and 209 (151,288) mM respectively.The mean KD C2 was not significantly different. (F = 0.807, p = 0.93) from baseline over 1, 2, and 4 hrs however, the MD demonstrated significant variability (F = 7.85, P < 0.001)Measuring mean log C2 at baseline and at 2 weeks, the KD demonstrated a stronger intraclass correlation of log C2 at baseline with 2 week log C2, ICC = 0.70 than was shown with the Mefar, ICC = 0.41Administering CA from KD offers a reproducible cough challenge in healthy volunteers. The results correlate well with the MD challenge but offer greater intra-day and inter-day reproducibility.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current controlled trials ISRCTN98385033.

摘要

未标注

测量咳嗽敏感性的方案在雾化器、镇咳剂、单次和剂量反应方面可能存在差异。需要建立一种确定的测量咳嗽敏感性的方法。欧洲呼吸学会(ERS)指南推荐使用KoKo DigiDoser(KD)给药系统。研究目的是比较这种柠檬酸(CA)咳嗽激发试验与先前建立的Mefar剂量计(MD)方案的可重复性。39名(女性26名)志愿者,平均年龄(40.4岁),被随机分为KD组或MD组。比较了日内和日间的可重复性。我们计算了诱发2次咳嗽(C2)的柠檬酸浓度。KD组和MD组诱发2次咳嗽的柠檬酸几何平均浓度(95%可信区间)相似,分别为263(200,339)mM和209(151,288)mM。KD组的平均C2与基线相比在1、2和4小时内无显著差异(F = 0.807,p = 0.然而,MD组显示出显著变异性(F = 7.85,P < 0.001)。在基线和2周时测量平均log C2,KD组在基线时log C2与2周时log C2的组内相关性更强,组内相关系数(ICC)= 0.70,而Mefar组为ICC = 0.41。从KD系统给予CA在健康志愿者中提供了可重复的咳嗽激发试验。结果与MD激发试验相关性良好,但具有更高的日内和日间可重复性。

试验注册

当前对照试验ISRCTN98385033。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba54/2925329/8c0fdda442c8/1745-9974-6-8-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验