Lalka S G, Unthank J L, McGue J G, Cikrit D F, Sawchuk A P, Dalsing M C
Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis 46202.
J Invest Surg. 1991;4(2):125-36. doi: 10.3109/08941939109140772.
A canine model of occlusive hindlimb venous hypertension was used to determine which of two different, clinically applicable, adjunctive arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), sequential or peripheral, would augment flow in autogenous cross-femoral venous bypass grafts (CFBs) with the least alteration of hindlimb hemodynamics. Unilateral venous hypertension was produced by iliofemoral venous ligation in three groups of five dogs: group I, venous ligation only (controls); group II, venous ligation followed by CFB with a sequential AVF; and group III, venous ligation with CFB and peripheral AVF. Bilateral hindlimb venous and arterial pressures and flows, and graft flows, were measured preoperatively and for 4 h postoperatively. Insertion of a CFB eliminated the venous hypertension in all 10 bypass dogs. Graft flow was augmented by addition of the sequential AVF (to 1167 +/- 309 mL/min from 92 +/- 12.3 mL/min: p less than .0001). However, this was accompanied, both in the limb ipsilateral to the AVF and in the contralateral limb, by the return of significant venous hypertension (p less than .001) and significant reduction (even reversal) of femoral vein flow caudad to the CFB (p less than .005). In contrast, adding the peripheral AVF augmented graft flow (to 200 +/- 62 mL/min from 65 +/- 43.7 mL/min; p less than .0001), but did not elevate venous pressure or impair venous flow in either hindlimb. The data from this short-term canine model suggest that a peripheral adjunctive AVF may effectively augment CFB graft flow without the potential for detrimental effects on venous hemodynamics characteristic of the sequential AVF.
采用犬后肢闭塞性静脉高压模型,以确定两种不同的、临床适用的辅助动静脉瘘(AVF),即序贯式或外周式,哪一种能在对后肢血流动力学影响最小的情况下增加自体股静脉交叉旁路移植术(CFB)的血流量。在三组每组五只犬中,通过髂股静脉结扎产生单侧静脉高压:第一组,仅进行静脉结扎(对照组);第二组,静脉结扎后行带序贯式AVF的CFB;第三组,静脉结扎并联合CFB和外周式AVF。术前及术后4小时测量双侧后肢静脉和动脉压力及血流量,以及移植血管血流量。在所有10只接受旁路手术的犬中,CFB的植入消除了静脉高压。序贯式AVF使移植血管血流量增加(从92±12.3毫升/分钟增至1167±309毫升/分钟:p<0.0001)。然而,在AVF同侧肢体和对侧肢体,这都伴随着显著静脉高压的恢复(p<0.001)以及CFB下游股静脉血流量的显著减少(甚至逆转)(p<0.005)。相比之下,添加外周式AVF增加了移植血管血流量(从65±43.7毫升/分钟增至200±62毫升/分钟;p<0.0001),但未升高任何一侧后肢的静脉压力或损害其静脉血流。这个短期犬模型的数据表明,外周辅助性AVF可能有效增加CFB移植血管血流量,而不会像序贯式AVF那样对静脉血流动力学产生潜在有害影响。