Department of Nutrition, Institute for Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010 Oct;64(10):1150-7. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.116. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Socioeconomic disparities in diet are well documented, but the relative importance of different indicators of socioeconomic position (SEP) is not well known. The aim of this study was to explore relationships between food patterns, SEP (occupation, education and income) and degree of work control.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: A cross-sectional population-based study 2000-2001, using three self-administered questionnaires including food frequency questions (FFQs). Factor analysis was used to explore food patterns. Participants include 9762 working Oslo citizens, 30-60 years of age, having answered the questionnaires with <20% of the FFQ missing.
Four food patterns were found: Western, prudent, traditional and sweet. In multivariate analyses, the likelihood of having a high intake of the Western pattern was lowest in the two highest educational groups (women: odds ratio (OR)=0.54/OR=0.75; men: OR=0.51/OR=0.76), and in the two highest occupational groups for men (OR=0.73/OR=0.78). The odds of having a high intake of the prudent pattern was highest in the two highest educational groups (women: OR=2.50/OR=1.84; men: OR=2.23/OR=1.37), and among the self-employed (women OR=1.61, men OR=1.68), as well as in the highest occupational group for men (OR=1.33). Women always having work control were least likely to have high intake of the Western pattern (OR=0.78) and most likely to have high intake of the prudent pattern (OR=1.39).
The SEP indicators were in different ways related to the food patterns, but the effect of occupation and income was partly explained by education, especially among women. Women's work control and men's occupation were important for their eating habits.
背景/目的:社会经济地位差异与饮食有密切关系,但不同社会经济地位(SEP)指标的相对重要性尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨食物模式、SEP(职业、教育和收入)与工作控制程度之间的关系。
受试者/方法:这是一项 2000-2001 年的基于人群的横断面研究,使用三份自填式问卷,包括食物频率问卷(FFQ)。采用因子分析方法探索食物模式。参与者包括 9762 名工作在奥斯陆的 30-60 岁的公民,他们回答了问卷,FFQ 缺失率<20%。
发现了 4 种食物模式:西方模式、谨慎模式、传统模式和甜食模式。在多变量分析中,高西方模式摄入量的可能性在两个最高教育组中最低(女性:比值比(OR)=0.54/OR=0.75;男性:OR=0.51/OR=0.76),在男性的两个最高职业组中也是如此(OR=0.73/OR=0.78)。高谨慎模式摄入量的可能性在两个最高教育组中最高(女性:OR=2.50/OR=1.84;男性:OR=2.23/OR=1.37),以及自雇人士(女性 OR=1.61,男性 OR=1.68),以及男性的最高职业组(OR=1.33)。一直有工作控制的女性最不可能有高西方模式摄入量(OR=0.78),最有可能有高谨慎模式摄入量(OR=1.39)。
SEP 指标以不同的方式与食物模式相关,但职业和收入的影响部分可以通过教育来解释,尤其是在女性中。女性的工作控制和男性的职业对他们的饮食习惯很重要。