Suppr超能文献

Hysterectomy or a minimal invasive alternative? A systematic review on quality of life and satisfaction.

作者信息

Brölmann H A M, Bijdevaate A J, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Janssen P F, Huirne J A F

出版信息

Gynecol Surg. 2010 Sep;7(3):205-210. doi: 10.1007/s10397-010-0589-9. Epub 2010 May 22.

Abstract

Nowadays, an increasing number of minimal invasive treatment alternatives to hysterectomy may be offered to the patient. In determining the appropriate treatment option, the patient has a distinct dilemma if a minimal invasive treatment with lesser effect than hysterectomy should be chosen or if a hysterectomy should be chosen which is a major surgery and requires longer recovery than the minimal invasive alternative. Quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaires that take subjective health perception into account are currently used to assess the treatment effects. The objective of this literature study is to determine and discuss the role of QoL as an outcome in randomized controlled trials (RCT) or systematic reviews of RCTs that study the treatment effect of hysterectomy compared to that of minimal invasive alternatives. A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed database and in the Cochrane database to find randomized trials and systematic reviews of randomized trials, comparing hysterectomy with minimal invasive or conservative treatment options with sufficient follow-up using satisfaction, health status, and quality of life as outcomes. The results were based on nine randomized trials and two systematic reviews. The differences are mostly in favor of hysterectomy. In two out of four studied treatment alternatives, the satisfaction or health status is different in favor of hysterectomy while the QoL is equivalent. After 2 years of follow-up, differences between both groups have disappeared, possibly because of the crossover effect. Possible reasons for the lesser response of QoL compared to satisfaction or health status are discussed. The fundamental question if patients have a better quality of life at all times if they choose for a minimal invasive alternative of hysterectomy remains unresolved. Information, individualization, and freedom of choice before surgery probably best serve the sense of well being and quality of life thereafter.

摘要

相似文献

1
Hysterectomy or a minimal invasive alternative? A systematic review on quality of life and satisfaction.
Gynecol Surg. 2010 Sep;7(3):205-210. doi: 10.1007/s10397-010-0589-9. Epub 2010 May 22.
3
Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 29;2016(1):CD003855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003855.pub3.
4
Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 23;2(2):CD000329. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000329.pub4.
5
Interventions for heavy menstrual bleeding; overview of Cochrane reviews and network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 31;5(5):CD013180. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013180.pub2.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Endovascular laser therapy for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(6):1-92. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
9
Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 29;8(8):CD000329. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000329.pub3.
10
Endovascular radiofrequency ablation for varicose veins: an evidence-based analysis.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2011;11(1):1-93. Epub 2011 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16(5):CD005073. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005073.pub3.
4
Uterine-artery embolization versus surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):360-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062003.
5
Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD003855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003855.pub2.
8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验