Division of Cardiology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, 251 E. Huron St., Feinberg Pavilion, Suite 8-503, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Adv Ther. 2010 Sep;27(9):600-12. doi: 10.1007/s12325-010-0060-3. Epub 2010 Aug 9.
This retrospective cohort study compared the direct medical costs of successful versus unsuccessful catheter ablation in Medicare-aged patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), using medical claims data.
AF patients with > or = 12 months of continuous medical/pharmacy coverage pre- and postablation were identified from the MarketScan Medicare database (January 2003 to December 2006). For study inclusion, patients were required to have > or = 2 AF inpatient/outpatient visits within 6 months and to have received antiarrhythmic drug therapy within 12 months prior to the index ablation. Ablation success was defined as the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy 6-12 months postablation.
Of 135 patients identified (67% men, mean age 73 years), ablation was successful in 69 (51.1%); most patients (96%) underwent a single procedure. Patients with successful ablation discontinued antiarrhythmic drug treatment after (mean) 54 days. Use of rate-control and anticoagulant drugs decreased after successful ablation, from 87% to 67% and from 86% to 64% of patients, respectively. Among failed ablation patients, 74% versus 70% received rate-control drugs, and 88% versus 82% received anticoagulants pre- versus postablation. Mean +/- SD per-patient procedural costs were $13,655+/-$12,761 for successful compared with $17,294+/-$26,502 (P=0.21) for failed ablation, while AF-related medical costs over 12 months postablation were $2394+/-$642 and $2703+/-$1706, respectively (P<0.001). Overall costs tended to be lower for successful ($16,049+/-$12,536) than for failed ($19,997+/-$13,958) AF ablation (P=0.07). These findings are subject to the limitations imposed by a retrospective database analysis and a small sample size.
Outside the clinical-trial setting, catheter ablation for second-line treatment of AF proved unsuccessful in half of Medicare-aged patients. Direct medical costs did not differ significantly between patients with failed and successful ablations. The high rate and costs of AF ablation failure in the Medicare-aged population reinforce the need for better understanding of prognostic factors for ablation outcome.
本回顾性队列研究使用医疗索赔数据比较了医疗保险年龄的房颤(AF)患者导管消融成功与不成功的直接医疗成本。
从 MarketScan Medicare 数据库(2003 年 1 月至 2006 年 12 月)中确定了 > 或 = 12 个月连续医疗/药物覆盖的 AF 患者。为了纳入研究,患者需要在 6 个月内有 > 或 = 2 次 AF 住院/门诊就诊,并在索引消融前 12 个月内有 > 或 = 2 次抗心律失常药物治疗。消融成功定义为消融后 6-12 个月无抗心律失常药物治疗。
在 135 名确定的患者中(67%为男性,平均年龄 73 岁),69 名(51.1%)患者消融成功;大多数患者(96%)接受了单次手术。成功消融的患者在(平均)54 天后停止使用抗心律失常药物治疗。成功消融后,心率控制和抗凝药物的使用率从 87%降至 67%和 86%降至 64%。在消融失败的患者中,74%与 70%接受了心率控制药物治疗,88%与 82%接受了抗凝药物治疗,消融前后。成功消融的每位患者的平均 +/- SD 程序成本为 13655 美元 +/-12761 美元,而失败消融为 17294 美元 +/-26502 美元(P=0.21),而消融后 12 个月的 AF 相关医疗费用分别为 2394 美元 +/-642 美元和 2703 美元 +/-1706 美元(P<0.001)。整体成本趋于降低成功(16049 美元 +/-12536 美元)比失败(19997 美元 +/-13958 美元)AF 消融(P=0.07)。这些发现受到回顾性数据库分析和样本量小的限制。
在临床试验之外,对于医疗保险年龄的患者,导管消融作为二线治疗房颤的效果并不理想。失败和成功消融患者的直接医疗成本无显著差异。在 Medicare 年龄人群中,房颤消融的高失败率和成本突显了更好地理解消融结果的预后因素的必要性。