Gilbert G L, MacInnes S J, Guise I A
Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ. 1991 Jun 15;302(6790):1432-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6790.1432.
To determine rates of colonisation with Haemophilus influenzae type b among household contacts of children with invasive H influenzae type b disease; compliance among medical staff with recommendations for use of rifampicin prophylaxis; and effects of rifampicin treatment in H influenzae type b colonisation of patients and contacts.
Prospective study of patients and their household contacts.
Royal Children's Hospital (the major paediatric hospital) in Victoria, Australia, with catchment population of 4.2 million, including 300,000 children aged under 5 years.
234 patients (age range 6 weeks to 8 years) with 235 episodes of all types of invasive H influenzae type b disease admitted during 1988-9 and their contacts.
Positive cultures of H influenzae type b from throat swabs taken at admission and six weeks subsequently; recording of rifampicin prophylaxis.
The percentage of patients with positive throat cultures fell from 69% (33/48) on day 1 of admission to 9% (4/47) after three days' treatment; at six weeks' follow up 32% (32/99) of patients who had not received rifampicin and 8% (5/61) who had, had positive throat cultures. Among household contacts, 33% (62/190) of children and 7% (25/359) of adults were colonised, and the colonisation rates were similar in contacts of patients with all types of H influenzae type b disease. Rifampicin prophylaxis was indicated in 85 families; in 34% it was not prescribed at all for contacts and in 41% not as recommended. The colonisation rates at follow up were significantly less in siblings given rifampicin (12%, 9/78), particularly in families in which all members were treated (3%), than in those in which they were not (36%) (odds ratio 21.5; 95% confidence interval 3.0 to 103.4).
The rate of throat colonisation with H influenzae type b was similar among siblings of children with all types of invasive H influenzae type b disease. Colonisation in contacts can be reduced by rifampicin prophylaxis, but some contacts remained colonised or were recolonised by the time of follow up. Medical staff complied poorly with current recommendations for rifampicin prophylaxis, which reduces its intrinsically limited value in preventing H influenzae type b disease.
确定b型流感嗜血杆菌侵袭性疾病患儿家庭接触者中b型流感嗜血杆菌的定植率;医务人员对使用利福平进行预防的建议的依从性;以及利福平治疗对患者及其接触者b型流感嗜血杆菌定植的影响。
对患者及其家庭接触者进行前瞻性研究。
澳大利亚维多利亚州的皇家儿童医院(主要儿科医院),服务人口为420万,其中包括30万名5岁以下儿童。
1988年至1989年期间收治的234例(年龄范围为6周龄至8岁)患有各类b型流感嗜血杆菌侵袭性疾病的235例患者及其接触者。
入院时及随后六周采集的咽拭子b型流感嗜血杆菌培养阳性情况;利福平预防用药的记录。
入院第1天咽拭子培养阳性的患者比例从69%(48例中的33例)降至治疗三天后的9%(47例中的4例);在六周随访时,未接受利福平治疗的患者中有32%(99例中的32例)咽拭子培养阳性,接受利福平治疗的患者中有8%(61例中的5例)咽拭子培养阳性。在家庭接触者中,33%(190名儿童中的62名)的儿童和7%(359名成人中的25名)的成人被定植,所有类型b型流感嗜血杆菌疾病患者的接触者中的定植率相似。85个家庭需要进行利福平预防;其中34%的家庭根本没有为接触者开利福平,41%的家庭未按建议开利福平。接受利福平治疗的兄弟姐妹在随访时的定植率显著低于未接受治疗的兄弟姐妹(12%,78名中的9名),特别是在所有家庭成员都接受治疗的家庭中(3%),低于未接受治疗的家庭(36%)(比值比21.5;95%置信区间3.0至103.4)。
各类b型流感嗜血杆菌侵袭性疾病患儿的兄弟姐妹中b型流感嗜血杆菌的咽部定植率相似。利福平预防可降低接触者的定植率,但在随访时仍有一些接触者被定植或再次被定植。医务人员对目前利福平预防的建议依从性较差,这降低了其在预防b型流感嗜血杆菌疾病方面本身就有限的价值。