Kendall S W, Brennan T G, Guillou P J
St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Br J Surg. 1991 Jun;78(6):705-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780623.
A total of 349 patients were randomized to undergo laparotomy through a lateral paramedian incision with layered closure (n = 137), a midline incision with mass closure (n = 104) or a midline incision using layered closure (n = 108), endeavouring to close the latter two incisions with a measured suture length to wound length ratio of greater than 4:1. After 18 months follow-up, no patient in the lateral paramedian group had developed an incisional hernia whereas 7 of 104 patients undergoing a midline incision with mass closure and 7 of 108 patients undergoing a midline incision with layered closure had incisional hernias (P less than 0.01). The mean suture length to wound length ratios for the three groups were 2.6 (range 1.3-6.2), 5.0 (range 3.0-8.7) and 3.7 (range 2.0-6.3) respectively (P less than 0.0001). The lateral paramedian incision remains superior to the midline incision closed with the mass technique and its integrity is independent of the suture length to wound length ratio.
共有349例患者被随机分组,分别接受经旁正中外侧切口分层缝合的剖腹手术(n = 137)、正中切口块状缝合(n = 104)或正中切口分层缝合(n = 108),后两组切口力求以大于4:1的缝合长度与伤口长度比进行缝合。随访18个月后,旁正中组无患者发生切口疝,而在接受正中切口块状缝合的104例患者中有7例以及接受正中切口分层缝合的108例患者中有7例发生了切口疝(P<0.01)。三组的平均缝合长度与伤口长度比分别为2.6(范围1.3 - 6.2)、5.0(范围3.0 - 8.7)和3.7(范围2.0 - 6.3)(P<0.0001)。旁正中切口仍然优于采用块状技术缝合的正中切口,并且其完整性与缝合长度与伤口长度比无关。