College of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud Bin Abdul Aziz University for Health Science, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
J Med Syst. 2011 Aug;35(4):713-21. doi: 10.1007/s10916-009-9408-0. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
As the need for knowledge exchange grows, so does the need to find new ways for researchers, decision makers, and educators to communicate and collaborate with each other on how to improve drug prescribing and use. In this paper, we introduce a conceptual framework for evaluating knowledge exchange activities within drug policy groups. The framework is grounded in the information and communication technologies (ICT) and knowledge exchange literature and is composed of various inputs, processes, and outputs. Inputs into the framework are research task, communication medium (face-to-face, teleconferencing, and web-conferencing), group characteristics (size, experience, goals, and roles), and context (description of linkage and exchange within the policy domain and group type). The inputs will affect how the social interaction process, knowledge brokering process, and information exchange process between drug policy groups (decision-makers, researchers, and educators) develop as part of the linkage and exchange knowledge exchange process. The inputs and how they shape the linkage and exchange knowledge exchange process will lead to different levels of engagement outputs and linkage and exchange outputs. Results of a refined conceptual framework based on a 2-year case study are also provided in the model where new inputs and processes are introduced.
随着知识交流需求的增长,研究人员、决策者和教育工作者需要寻找新的方法,就如何改进药物处方和使用进行沟通和协作。在本文中,我们引入了一个评估药物政策团体内部知识交流活动的概念框架。该框架基于信息和通信技术(ICT)以及知识交流文献,由各种投入、过程和产出组成。框架的投入包括研究任务、沟通媒介(面对面、电话会议和网络会议)、群体特征(规模、经验、目标和角色)以及背景(政策领域和团体类型内的联系和交流描述)。这些投入将影响药物政策团体(决策者、研究人员和教育工作者)之间的社会互动过程、知识中介过程和信息交流过程如何作为联系和交流知识交流过程的一部分发展。投入以及它们如何塑造联系和交流知识交流过程将导致不同程度的参与产出和联系和交流产出。该模型还提供了基于为期两年的案例研究的精炼概念框架的结果,其中引入了新的投入和过程。