Dagenais Christian, Somé Télesphore D, Boileau-Falardeau Michèle, McSween-Cadieux Esther, Ridde Valéry
Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;
Knowledge Broker, Société d'Études et de Recherche en Santé Publique, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Glob Health Action. 2015 Jan 27;8:26004. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.26004. eCollection 2015.
Despite efforts expended over recent decades, there is a persistent gap between the production of scientific evidence and its use. This is mainly due to the difficulty of bringing such knowledge to health workers and decision-makers so that it can inform practices and decisions on a timely basis. One strategy for transferring knowledge to potential users, that is, gaining increasing legitimacy, is knowledge brokering (KB), effectiveness of which in certain conditions has been demonstrated through empirical research. However, little is known about how to implement such a strategy, especially in the African context. The KB program presented here is aimed specifically at narrowing the gap by making scientific knowledge available to users with the potential to improve health-related practices and decision making in Burkina Faso. The program involves Canadian and African researchers, a knowledge broker, health practitioners, and policy-makers. This article presents the collaborative development of the KB strategy and the evaluation of its implementation at year 1. The KB strategy was developed in stages, beginning with a scoping study to ensure the most recent studies were considered. Two one-day workshops were then conducted to explore the problem of low research use and to adapt the strategy to the Burkinabè context. Based on these workshops, the KB program was developed and brokers were recruited and trained. Evaluation of the program's implementation after the first year showed that: 1) the preparatory activities were greatly appreciated by participants, and most considered the content useful for their work; 2) the broker had carried out his role in accordance with the logic model; and 3) this role was seen as important by the participants targeted by the activities and outputs. Participants made suggestions for program improvements in subsequent years, stressing particularly the need to involve decision-makers at the central level.
尽管近几十年来付出了诸多努力,但科学证据的产出与应用之间仍存在持续差距。这主要是因为将此类知识传递给卫生工作者和决策者存在困难,从而无法及时为实践和决策提供依据。将知识传递给潜在用户(即获得越来越多认可)的一种策略是知识中介(KB),实证研究已证明其在某些情况下的有效性。然而,对于如何实施这样一种策略,尤其是在非洲背景下,人们了解甚少。此处介绍的知识中介项目旨在通过向有可能改善布基纳法索卫生相关实践和决策的用户提供科学知识,来缩小这一差距。该项目涉及加拿大和非洲的研究人员、一名知识中介、卫生从业者和政策制定者。本文介绍了知识中介策略的合作开发以及对其第一年实施情况的评估。知识中介策略分阶段制定,首先进行了一项范围界定研究,以确保纳入最新研究。随后举办了两次为期一天的研讨会,探讨研究利用率低的问题,并使该策略适用于布基纳法索的实际情况。基于这些研讨会,制定了知识中介项目,并招募和培训了中介人员。对该项目第一年实施情况的评估表明:1)筹备活动受到参与者的高度赞赏,大多数人认为其内容对工作有用;2)中介人员按照逻辑模型履行了职责;3)该职责被活动和产出所针对的参与者视为重要职责。参与者对后续年份的项目改进提出了建议,特别强调需要让中央层面的决策者参与进来。