Suppr超能文献

在眼科医学系中比较双向文本与传统寻呼系统。

A comparison of two-way text versus conventional paging systems in an academic ophthalmology department.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.

出版信息

J Med Syst. 2010 Aug;34(4):677-84. doi: 10.1007/s10916-009-9281-x. Epub 2009 May 9.

Abstract

Alphanumeric paging systems are unidirectional without prioritization capabilities. Newer electronic communication devices such as two-way text paging systems are capable of bidirectional paging and prioritization. While previous studies have evaluated alphanumeric paging systems in academic hospital settings, bidirectional two-way text paging systems have not been investigated. The goal of this study was to evaluate efficiency and impact on patient care delivery of a two-way text paging system compared to conventional one-way alphanumeric pagers. This unmasked, crossover prospective study was divided into three phases. In phase one, surveys were distributed to all ophthalmology attending physicians, residents, clinical technicians, and secretaries to assess the conventional alphanumeric paging system. In phase two, these participants used two-way text pagers without instruction (unstructured format) that they subsequently compared to the alphanumeric system with devised surveys assessing (on a scale of 0 to 100) time saved, increased daily efficiency, facilitation in patient care, and overall impression (helpfulness).In phase three, participants used a specific communication prioritization protocol (structured format) with the two-way text pagers with subsequent comparison and assessment with the same surveys. Compared to traditional alphanumeric pagers, new digital two-way text pagers were found to be statistically (p < 0.0001) more helpful by participants in all categories: as a time saver (80.33 vs. 56.95) p < 0.0001, increased daily efficiency (78.15 vs. 57.13) p < 0.0001, facilitation in patient care (78.79 vs. 56.95) p < 0.0001, and overall impression (helpfulness) (61.82 vs. 84.33) p < 0.0001. When compared to the alphanumeric pager, the two-way text pager was found to decrease subjectively call backs (73.6% to 45.6%, p < 0.0001), reduce interruptions of learning activities (43.63% to 26.6%, p < 0.0001) and enabled better patient care (59.8% to 42.2%, p < 0.0001). No significant statistical difference was found between the structured and unstructured system. Two-way text paging (structured versus unstructured guidance) was preferred over the conventional one-way alphanumeric paging system in every participant category. Two-way text paging is an effective alternative to alphanumeric paging, demonstrating saved time, increased daily efficiency, reduced call backs and interruptions of educational activities, and facilitation in patient care.

摘要

双向文本寻呼系统具有双向寻呼和优先级功能,而数字字母寻呼系统则是单向的,没有优先级功能。较新的电子通信设备,如双向文本寻呼系统,能够进行双向寻呼和优先级设置。虽然之前的研究已经评估了数字字母寻呼系统在学术医院环境中的应用,但双向文本寻呼系统尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是评估双向文本寻呼系统与传统的单向数字字母寻呼系统相比在提高效率和改善患者护理方面的效果。这项非盲、交叉前瞻性研究分为三个阶段。第一阶段,向所有眼科主治医生、住院医师、临床技术员和秘书分发调查问卷,以评估传统的数字字母寻呼系统。第二阶段,这些参与者使用双向文本寻呼器(无指导、非结构化格式),然后用设计好的调查问卷对其进行评估(0 到 100 分),以评估节省时间、提高日常效率、方便患者护理和整体印象(帮助程度)。在第三阶段,参与者使用双向文本寻呼器的特定通信优先级协议(结构化格式),然后用相同的调查问卷进行比较和评估。与传统的数字字母寻呼器相比,新的数字双向文本寻呼器在所有类别中都被参与者认为更有帮助:节省时间(80.33 比 56.95),p<0.0001;提高日常效率(78.15 比 57.13),p<0.0001;方便患者护理(78.79 比 56.95),p<0.0001;整体印象(帮助程度)(61.82 比 84.33),p<0.0001。与数字字母寻呼器相比,双向文本寻呼器被发现可以减少主观回拨(73.6% 到 45.6%),减少学习活动的中断(43.63% 到 26.6%),并能更好地为患者提供护理(59.8% 到 42.2%)。p<0.0001。在每个参与者类别中,双向文本寻呼系统(结构化与非结构化指导)都比传统的单向数字字母寻呼系统更受欢迎。双向文本寻呼是数字字母寻呼的有效替代方案,它节省了时间,提高了日常效率,减少了回拨和教育活动的中断,方便了患者护理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验