Department of Neurology, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg.
Stroke. 2010 Sep;41(9):2016-20. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581991. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
There is currently no consensus on (1) the percentage of patients who develop spasticity after ischemic stroke, (2) the relation between spasticity and initial clinical findings after acute stroke, and (3) the impact of spasticity on activities of daily living and health-related quality of life.
In a prospective cohort study, 301 consecutive patients with clinical signs of central paresis due to a first-ever ischemic stroke were examined in the acute stage and 6 months later. At both times, the degree and pattern of paresis and muscle tone, the Barthel Index, and the EQ-5D score, a standardized instrument of health-related quality of life, were evaluated. Spasticity was assessed on the Modified Ashworth Scale and defined as Modified Ashworth Scale >1 in any of the examined joints.
Two hundred eleven patients (70.1%) were reassessed after 6 months. Of these, 42.6% (n=90) had developed spasticity. A more severe degree of spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale >or=3) was observed in 15.6% of all patients. The prevalence of spasticity did not differ between upper and lower limbs, but in the upper limb muscles, higher degrees of spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale >or=3) were more frequently (18.9%) observed than in the lower limbs (5.5%). Regression analysis used to test the differences between upper and lower limbs showed that patients with more severe paresis in the proximal and distal limb muscles had a higher risk for developing spasticity (P<or=0.001). Spasticity of the upper and lower limb was more frequent in patients with hemihypesthesia than in patients without sensory deficits (P<or=0.001). Patients with spasticity showed a lower Barthel Index and EQ-5D score compared with the group without spasticity.
Spasticity was present in 42.6% of patients with initial central paresis. However, severe spasticity was relatively rare. Predictors for the development of spasticity were a severe degree of paresis and hemihypesthesia at stroke onset.
目前,关于(1)发生缺血性卒中后痉挛的患者比例、(2)痉挛与急性卒中后初始临床发现之间的关系、以及(3)痉挛对日常生活活动和健康相关生活质量的影响,尚无共识。
在一项前瞻性队列研究中,对 301 例首次发生缺血性卒中且存在中枢性瘫痪临床体征的连续患者进行了急性阶段和 6 个月后的检查。在这两个时间点,评估了瘫痪程度和模式、肌肉张力、巴氏量表和 EQ-5D 评分(健康相关生活质量的标准化工具)。采用改良 Ashworth 量表评估痉挛,并将任何检查关节的改良 Ashworth 量表>1 定义为痉挛。
211 例患者(70.1%)在 6 个月后接受了重新评估。其中,42.6%(n=90)出现了痉挛。所有患者中,15.6%存在更严重的痉挛(改良 Ashworth 量表>3)。上下肢的痉挛患病率无差异,但在上肢肌肉中,更频繁地观察到更高程度的痉挛(改良 Ashworth 量表>3,18.9%),而下肢(5.5%)较少见。用于测试上下肢之间差异的回归分析表明,近端和远端肢体肌肉瘫痪程度更严重的患者发生痉挛的风险更高(P<0.001)。与无感觉缺陷的患者相比,半侧感觉缺失的患者上肢和下肢痉挛更为常见(P<0.001)。与无痉挛患者相比,有痉挛的患者巴氏量表和 EQ-5D 评分较低。
初始存在中枢性瘫痪的患者中,42.6%存在痉挛。然而,严重痉挛相对较少见。痉挛发生的预测因素为卒中发作时瘫痪程度严重和半侧感觉缺失。