Free University Brussels (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2010 Nov;19(6):485-95. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32833b4886.
Behavioural changes are an important partner in the fight against cancer (primary prevention or the choice to participate in secondary prevention). To make such behavioural changes, people need to have a correct assessment of their own risk, which is often underestimated or overestimated. These risk estimates depend, among others, on the calculation method that is used. Currently, the method that is used most often is 'indirect cumulative risk' (ICR). We discuss several drawbacks of using ICR in individual counselling and therefore use an alternative method. In this alternative (life table method) we calculated 10-year risks for a whole range of cancers as a function of the current age and risk profile, while taking into account other causes of death. These estimates can easily be used to give an individualized assessment of the risk of cancer. Regardless of the risk estimation method used, the risk needs to be broken down for 'risk factors'. If only the risk for an average person of the population is given, this means a small overestimation for the non-risk group, but a significant underestimation for the at-risk group. When we compare the life table risk as a function of risk factors to the more commonly used ICR, large differences are found, especially in prostate, breast and lung carcinomas. The life table method, although it has certain limitations, has advantages over the ICR method for individual counselling. To our knowledge this is the first overview in which 10-year risks as a function of the current risk profile are given for multiple cancers. The calculated risks are primarily intended to better inform people who are considering preventive measures. For example, for a 40-year-old woman without familial risk who is considering the pros and cons of breast cancer mammographic screening, it is more interesting to know that she has a 0.7% chance of getting breast cancer in the next 5 years, rather than being told that 11% of women get breast cancer during their lives (ICR 0-74). Current smokers can now be given absolute risk reduction estimates of smoking cessation. To keep the life table risk estimates up to date, they must be repeated every couple of years, using up-to-date incidence and mortality data.
行为改变是对抗癌症的重要伙伴(一级预防或选择参与二级预防)。为了实现这些行为改变,人们需要对自己的风险有正确的评估,而这种评估往往被低估或高估。这些风险估计取决于所使用的计算方法。目前,使用最广泛的方法是“间接累积风险”(ICR)。我们讨论了在个体咨询中使用 ICR 的几个缺点,因此使用了一种替代方法。在这种替代方法(寿命表法)中,我们根据当前年龄和风险状况,计算了一系列癌症的 10 年风险,同时考虑了其他死因。这些估计值可以很容易地用于对癌症风险进行个体化评估。无论使用哪种风险估计方法,都需要将风险分解为“风险因素”。如果只给出人群中平均人的风险,这意味着对非风险组的估计偏高,但对风险组的估计偏低。当我们将寿命表风险作为风险因素的函数与更常用的 ICR 进行比较时,会发现很大的差异,特别是在前列腺癌、乳腺癌和肺癌中。尽管寿命表法有一定的局限性,但在个体咨询方面,它优于 ICR 法。据我们所知,这是第一个给出多种癌症与当前风险状况相关的 10 年风险的概述。计算出的风险主要用于更好地告知那些正在考虑预防措施的人。例如,对于一个没有家族风险的 40 岁女性,正在考虑乳腺癌乳房 X 线筛查的利弊,她更有兴趣知道她在未来 5 年内患乳腺癌的几率为 0.7%,而不是被告知 11%的女性在一生中会患乳腺癌(ICR 0-74)。目前的吸烟者现在可以获得戒烟的绝对风险降低估计。为了保持寿命表风险估计的最新,必须使用最新的发病率和死亡率数据,每隔几年重复一次。