• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[风沙土中微生物总DNA提取与纯化方法的比较]

[Comparison of the methods for extracting and purifying microbial total DNA from an aeolian sandy soil].

作者信息

Xu Xiao-jiao, Cao Cheng-you, Cui Zhen-bo, Yang Min

机构信息

College of Sciences, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2010 May;21(5):1327-33.

PMID:20707121
Abstract

In order to select and establish an appropriate method for extracting and purifying the microbial total DNA from an aeolian sandy soil, six extraction methods (five direct methods and one indirect method) and two purification methods were examined, with the quantity and quality of extracted and purified total DNA compared. All the six extraction methods could extract the total DNA with a length of approximately 23 kb, among which, the improved SDS high salt extraction method (using 40% PEG8000 and 4 mol x L(-1) NaCl to precipitate DNA) was the best. This method could have a yield slightly less than that obtained by using kits, and the extracted DNA had the highest purity after purification, being available in 16S rDNA PCR amplification. Among the purification methods, the effect of agarose gel electrophoresis plus minicolumn was satisfactory, with most of the purified total DNA being able to be PCR-amplified and meet the requirements of the purity of DNA in the follow-up molecular operations.

摘要

为了选择并建立一种从风沙土中提取和纯化微生物总DNA的合适方法,研究了六种提取方法(五种直接法和一种间接法)和两种纯化方法,并比较了提取和纯化后总DNA的数量和质量。六种提取方法均能提取出长度约为23 kb的总DNA,其中改良SDS高盐提取法(使用40% PEG8000和4 mol·L⁻¹ NaCl沉淀DNA)效果最佳。该方法的产量略低于试剂盒提取法,纯化后提取的DNA纯度最高,可用于16S rDNA PCR扩增。在纯化方法中,琼脂糖凝胶电泳加微型柱的效果令人满意,大部分纯化后的总DNA能够进行PCR扩增,并满足后续分子操作中DNA纯度的要求。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of the methods for extracting and purifying microbial total DNA from an aeolian sandy soil].[风沙土中微生物总DNA提取与纯化方法的比较]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2010 May;21(5):1327-33.
2
A developed DNA extraction method for different soil samples.一种适用于不同土壤样本的 DNA 提取方法。
J Basic Microbiol. 2010 Aug;50(4):401-7. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200900373.
3
[Extraction method of soil microbial DNA for molecular ecology study].
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2005 May;16(5):956-60.
4
[An efficient method for DNA extraction from compost].[一种从堆肥中提取DNA的高效方法]
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao. 2006 Feb;46(1):162-5.
5
[Comparison of direct and indirect environmental DNA extraction methods for samples from a high-temperature environment].[高温环境样本直接与间接环境DNA提取方法的比较]
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao. 2006 Dec;46(6):1018-22.
6
Enhanced method for microbial community DNA extraction and purification from agricultural yellow loess soil.从农业黄土土壤中提取和纯化微生物群落DNA的改进方法。
J Microbiol. 2015 Nov;53(11):767-75. doi: 10.1007/s12275-015-5454-0. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
7
Comparison of methods for total community DNA extraction and purification from compost.从堆肥中提取和纯化总群落DNA的方法比较。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Mar;74(4):918-25. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0704-z. Epub 2006 Nov 18.
8
[A highly effective extraction method for PCR analysis of soil microbial DNA].[一种用于土壤微生物DNA的PCR分析的高效提取方法]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2006 Nov;17(11):2107-11.
9
An evaluation of commercial DNA extraction kits for the isolation of bacterial spore DNA from soil.商业 DNA 提取试剂盒从土壤中分离细菌孢子 DNA 的评估。
J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Dec;109(6):1886-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04816.x.
10
DNA extraction from soils: old bias for new microbial diversity analysis methods.从土壤中提取DNA:新的微生物多样性分析方法存在的旧有偏差
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 May;67(5):2354-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.5.2354-2359.2001.

引用本文的文献

1
Diversity and Functional Distribution Characteristics of Myxobacterial Communities in the Rhizosphere of Lour in Ebinur Lake Wetland, China.中国艾比湖湿地芦苇根际黏细菌群落的多样性及功能分布特征
Microorganisms. 2023 Jul 28;11(8):1924. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11081924.