Cardoso Hugo F V
Departamento de Zoologia e Antropologia, Museu Nacional de Histria Natural & Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Lisboa, Portugal.
J Forensic Sci. 2010 Nov;55(6):1557-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01530.x.
Three studies have proposed discriminant functions for sex determination from deciduous tooth crown dimensions, and this study tests the existing functions on a sample of 46 Portuguese immature skeletons of known sex, aged from birth to 10 years. Deciduous teeth were measured in their mesiodistal and faciolingual crown dimensions, and percentage of correct allocation accuracy in determining sex using each specific function was determined. Discriminant functions were also calculated from data collected for this study and tested using cross-validation. Results show poor overall accuracy (33.3–75%) and poor cross-validation (46.2–60.0%). This is related to low sexual dimorphism in deciduous tooth crown size, as well as differences in degree of sexual dimorphism and in overall tooth size between different samples. For these reasons, deciduous crown size does not seem to show significant forensic value as discriminator of sex, particularly when methods developed on one population are applied to individuals of another population.
有三项研究提出了根据乳牙冠尺寸来确定性别的判别函数,本研究对46具已知性别的葡萄牙未成熟骨骼样本(年龄从出生到10岁)测试了现有的函数。测量了乳牙的近远中径和颊舌径冠尺寸,并确定了使用每个特定函数确定性别时的正确分配准确率。还根据本研究收集的数据计算了判别函数,并使用交叉验证进行了测试。结果显示总体准确率较低(33.3%-75%),交叉验证效果也较差(46.2%-60.0%)。这与乳牙冠尺寸的低性别二态性有关,也与不同样本之间性别二态性程度和整体牙齿大小的差异有关。由于这些原因,乳牙冠尺寸似乎没有显示出作为性别判别指标的显著法医价值,特别是当在一个人群中开发的方法应用于另一人群的个体时。