• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜括约肌切开术的并发症及其处理:达成共识的尝试

Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.

作者信息

Cotton P B, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen J E, Russell R C, Meyers W C, Liguory C, Nickl N

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 May-Jun;37(3):383-93. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2
PMID:2070995
Abstract

Despite its relative safety (in comparison with surgery), and undoubted role in many clinical circumstances, biliary sphincterotomy is the most dangerous procedure routinely performed by endoscopists. Complications occur in about 10% of patients; 2 to 3% have a prolonged hospital stay, with a risk of dying. This document is an attempt to provide guidelines for prevention and management of complications, based on a workshop of selected experts, and a comprehensive review of the literature. We emphasize particularly the importance of specialist training, disinfection, drainage, and collaboration with surgical colleagues.

摘要

尽管胆管括约肌切开术相对安全(与手术相比),且在许多临床情况下具有不可置疑的作用,但它却是内镜医师常规实施的最危险的操作。约10%的患者会出现并发症;2%至3%的患者住院时间延长,并有死亡风险。本文基于一次选定专家研讨会及对文献的全面综述,试图提供并发症预防和管理的指导原则。我们特别强调专科培训、消毒、引流以及与外科同事协作的重要性。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.内镜括约肌切开术的并发症及其处理:达成共识的尝试
Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 May-Jun;37(3):383-93. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70740-2.
2
Surgical management of complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy with precut papillotomy.内镜括约肌切开术联合预切开乳头括约肌切开术并发症的外科治疗
Am J Surg. 1990 Jan;159(1):132-5; discussion 135-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80618-x.
3
ERCP- and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术及内镜括约肌切开术所致胰腺炎
Pancreas. 1991 May;6(3):350-67. doi: 10.1097/00006676-199105000-00013.
4
Complications related to diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.与诊断性和治疗性内镜逆行胰胆管造影相关的并发症
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1996 Apr;6(2):379-407.
5
Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: avoidance and management.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的并发症:预防与处理
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2012 Jul;22(3):567-86. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2012.05.001.
6
Adverse events associated with ERCP.与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)相关的不良事件。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jan;85(1):32-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.051. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
7
Selected treatments for duodenal perforation after ERCP. A report of three cases.ERCP术后十二指肠穿孔的选择性治疗。三例报告
Chir Ital. 2007 May-Jun;59(3):343-6.
8
Transduodenal sphincterotomy in laparoscopic era.腹腔镜时代的经十二指肠括约肌切开术
World J Surg. 2001 Oct;25(10):1357-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0123-3.
9
Retroperitoneal perforation during ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy: causes, clinical features and management.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)及内镜下括约肌切开术期间的腹膜后穿孔:病因、临床特征及处理
Endoscopy. 1990 Jul;22(4):174-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1012833.
10
Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的不良结局
Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2002 Fall;2(4):147-68.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy of balloon dilatation duration on patients with choledocholithiasis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematic review.胆管扩张持续时间对胆总管结石患者的疗效比较:一项贝叶斯网络Meta分析和系统评价
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12168-4.
2
Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is superior to biliary stent placement in preventing postendoscopic papillary balloon dilation pancreatitis.在内镜下乳头球囊扩张术后预防胰腺炎方面,内镜鼻胆管引流术优于胆管支架置入术。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 29;18:17562848251365025. doi: 10.1177/17562848251365025. eCollection 2025.
3
Rescue Needle Knife Papillotomy Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Cannulation: Success and Complications in a Retrospective Comparative Study With Procedure Time-Matched Controls.
救援针刀乳头切开术在内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)插管中的应用:一项与手术时间匹配的对照的回顾性比较研究中的成功率和并发症
Cureus. 2025 Aug 15;17(8):e90141. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90141. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Prophylactic Biliary Stenting After Stone Clearance Improves the Safety of Needle-Knife Fistulotomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.结石清除后预防性胆管支架置入可提高针刀瘘管切开术的安全性:一项倾向评分匹配分析
JGH Open. 2025 Jul 30;9(8):e70244. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70244. eCollection 2025 Aug.
5
Efficacy and safety of modified dual knife fistulotomy in complex ERCP cases involving type 3 papilla.改良双刀瘘管切开术在涉及3型乳头的复杂内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)病例中的疗效与安全性。
Front Surg. 2025 Jul 15;12:1539012. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1539012. eCollection 2025.
6
Outcomes and complications of biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction: National prospective study.恶性胆管梗阻胆道引流的结局与并发症:全国前瞻性研究
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Jul 23;13:a25586754. doi: 10.1055/a-2558-6754. eCollection 2025.
7
Increased capture of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography adverse events by delayed (day 7) follow-up calls: a prospective comparison of physician- and nurse-initiated calls.通过延迟(第7天)随访电话增加内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后不良事件的捕获:医生发起与护士发起电话的前瞻性比较
Ann Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul-Aug;38(4):440-445. doi: 10.20524/aog.2025.0970. Epub 2025 May 16.
8
Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation in recurrence and unresectable Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.肝门部胆管癌复发及不可切除病例的胆管内射频消融术
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04104-6.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Multihole Partially Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.多孔部分覆盖自膨式金属支架治疗远端恶性胆管梗阻的疗效与安全性:一项单中心回顾性研究
DEN Open. 2025 Jun 22;6(1):e70168. doi: 10.1002/deo2.70168. eCollection 2026 Apr.
10
Dome tapered tip sphincterotomes in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A pilot study on cannulation success and postprocedural pancreatitis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中球囊锥形头括约肌切开刀:插管成功率及术后胰腺炎的初步研究
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 May 27;17(5):104043. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.104043.