Suppr超能文献

乌干达接受抗逆转录病毒治疗者的家庭成员中,家庭和诊所 HIV 检测的比较:一项随机试验的结果。

Comparison of home and clinic-based HIV testing among household members of persons taking antiretroviral therapy in Uganda: results from a randomized trial.

机构信息

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-Uganda, Global AIDS Program, National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Entebbe, Uganda.

出版信息

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Oct;55(2):245-52. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181e9e069.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Due to high rates of undiagnosed and untreated HIV infection in Africa, we compared HIV counseling and testing (VCT) uptake among household members of patients receiving antiretroviral therapy.

METHODS

HIV-infected persons attending an AIDS clinic were randomized to a home-based or clinic-based antiretroviral therapy program including VCT for household members. Clinic arm participants were given free VCT vouchers and encouraged to invite their household members to the clinic for VCT. Home arm participants were visited, and their household members offered VCT using a 3-test rapid finger-stick testing algorithm. VCT uptake and HIV prevalence were compared.

FINDINGS

Of 7184 household members, 3974 (55.3%) were female and 4798 (66.8%) were in the home arm. Home arm household members were more likely to receive VCT than those from the clinic arm (55.8% vs. 10.9%, odds ratio: 10.41, 95% confidence interval: 7.89 to 13.73; P < 0.001), although the proportion of HIV-infected household members was higher in the clinic arm (17.3% vs. 7.1%, odds ratio: 2.76, 95% confidence interval: 1.97 to 3.86, P < 0.001). HIV prevalence among all household members tested in the home arm was 56% compared with 27% in the clinic arm. Of 148 spouses of HIV-infected patients, 69 (46.6%) were uninfected. Persons aged 15-24 were less likely to test than other age groups, and in the home arm, women were more likely to test than men.

CONCLUSIONS

Home-based VCT for household members of HIV-infected persons was feasible, associated with lower prevalence, higher uptake, and increased identification of HIV-infected persons than clinic-based provision.

摘要

目的

由于非洲艾滋病毒感染的诊断和治疗率较高,我们比较了接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的患者的家庭成员中接受艾滋病病毒咨询和检测(VCT)的情况。

方法

参加艾滋病诊所的艾滋病毒感染者被随机分配到基于家庭或基于诊所的抗逆转录病毒治疗方案,包括为家庭成员提供 VCT。诊所组的参与者获得免费的 VCT 代金券,并被鼓励邀请其家庭成员到诊所进行 VCT。家访组的参与者接受家访,他们的家庭成员使用 3 项快速手指刺测试算法接受 VCT。比较 VCT 的采用情况和艾滋病毒流行率。

结果

在 7184 名家庭成员中,3974 名(55.3%)为女性,4798 名(66.8%)为家访组。家访组的家庭成员比诊所组更有可能接受 VCT(55.8%比 10.9%,优势比:10.41,95%置信区间:7.89 至 13.73;P < 0.001),尽管诊所组的 HIV 感染家庭成员比例更高(17.3%比 7.1%,优势比:2.76,95%置信区间:1.97 至 3.86,P < 0.001)。在家访组接受测试的所有家庭成员中,艾滋病毒流行率为 56%,而在诊所组中为 27%。在 148 名艾滋病毒感染患者的配偶中,有 69 名(46.6%)未感染。15-24 岁的人比其他年龄组更不可能接受检测,在家访组中,女性比男性更有可能接受检测。

结论

为艾滋病毒感染者的家庭成员提供家庭为基础的 VCT 是可行的,与诊所为基础的服务相比,艾滋病毒感染率较低,接受率较高,并且更多地发现了艾滋病毒感染者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验