• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件问题代码:规范与医疗器械使用相关的器械和患者问题的分类。

FDA adverse Event Problem Codes: standardizing the classification of device and patient problems associated with medical device use.

作者信息

Reed Terrie L, Kaufman-Rivi Diana

机构信息

FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Office of Surveillance and Biometrics, USA.

出版信息

Biomed Instrum Technol. 2010 May-Jun;44(3):248-56. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-44.3.248.

DOI:10.2345/0899-8205-44.3.248
PMID:20715359
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The broad array of medical devices and the potential for device failures, malfunctions, and other adverse events associated with each device creates a challenge for public health device surveillance programs. Coding reported events by type of device problem provides one method for identifying a potential signal of a larger device issue. The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) Event Problem Codes that are used to report adverse events previously lacked a structured set of controls for code development and maintenance. Over time this led to inconsistent, ambiguous, and duplicative concepts being added to the code set on an ad-hoc basis. Recognizing the limitation of its coding system the FDA set out to update the system to improve its usefulness within FDA and as a basis of a global standard to identify important patient and device outcomes throughout the medical community.

METHODS

In 2004, FDA and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) whereby NCI agreed to provide terminology development and maintenance services to all FDA Centers. Under this MOU, CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics (OSB) convened a cross-Center workgroup and collaborated with staff at NCI Enterprise Vocabulary Service (EVS) to streamline the Patient and Device Problem Codes and integrate them into the NCI Thesaurus and Meta-Thesaurus. This initiative included many enhancements to the Event Problem Codes aimed at improving code selection as well as improving adverse event report analysis. LIMITATIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff resources, database concerns, and limited collaboration with external groups in the initial phases of the project are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse events associated with medical device use can be better understood when they are reported using a consistent and well-defined code set. This FDA initiative was an attempt to improve the structure and add control mechanisms to an existing code set, improve analysis tools that will better identify device safety trends, and improve the ability to prevent or mitigate effects of adverse events associated with medical device use.

摘要

未标注

种类繁多的医疗设备以及与每种设备相关的设备故障、失灵和其他不良事件的可能性,给公共卫生设备监测计划带来了挑战。按设备问题类型对报告的事件进行编码,为识别更大设备问题的潜在信号提供了一种方法。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的设备与放射健康中心(CDRH)用于报告不良事件的事件问题代码,以前缺乏用于代码开发和维护的结构化控制集。随着时间的推移,这导致在临时基础上向代码集添加了不一致、模糊和重复的概念。认识到其编码系统的局限性,FDA着手更新该系统,以提高其在FDA内部的实用性,并作为全球标准的基础,以识别整个医学界重要的患者和设备结果。

方法

2004年,FDA与美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)签署了一份谅解备忘录(MOU),据此NCI同意向所有FDA中心提供术语开发和维护服务。根据这份谅解备忘录,CDRH的监测与生物统计学办公室(OSB)召集了一个跨中心工作组,并与NCI企业词汇服务(EVS)的工作人员合作,简化患者和设备问题代码,并将其整合到NCI词库和元词库中。该倡议包括对事件问题代码的许多改进,旨在改善代码选择以及改进不良事件报告分析。局限性与建议:讨论了项目初始阶段的人员资源、数据库问题以及与外部团体的有限合作。

结论

当使用一致且定义明确的代码集报告与医疗设备使用相关的不良事件时,可以更好地理解这些事件。FDA的这项举措旨在改进现有代码集的结构并添加控制机制,改进能够更好地识别设备安全趋势的分析工具,以及提高预防或减轻与医疗设备使用相关的不良事件影响的能力。

相似文献

1
FDA adverse Event Problem Codes: standardizing the classification of device and patient problems associated with medical device use.美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件问题代码:规范与医疗器械使用相关的器械和患者问题的分类。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2010 May-Jun;44(3):248-56. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-44.3.248.
2
Safe Medical Devices Act: management guidance for hospital compliance with the new FDA requirements.《安全医疗器械法案》:医院遵守美国食品药品监督管理局新要求的管理指南
Hosp Technol Ser. 1993 Oct;12(11):1-27.
3
Medical devices, the FDA, and the home healthcare clinician.医疗设备、美国食品药品监督管理局与家庭医疗保健临床医生
Home Healthc Nurse. 2014 Jul-Aug;32(7):402-8. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000107.
4
An Analysis of the FDA MAUDE Database and the Search for Cobalt Toxicity in Class 3 Johnson & Johnson/DePuy Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants.对 FDA MAUDE 数据库的分析以及对 3 类强生/DePuy 金属对金属髋关节植入物中钴毒性的研究。
J Patient Saf. 2018 Dec;14(4):e89-e96. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000534.
5
Variability in code selection using the 1995 and 1998 HCFA documentation guidelines for office services. Health Care Financing Administration.使用1995年和1998年医疗保健财务管理局(HCFA)办公室服务文件指南进行代码选择时的变异性。医疗保健财务管理局。
J Fam Pract. 2000 Jul;49(7):642-5.
6
Update on the European database.欧洲数据库的更新情况。
Med Device Technol. 2001 Oct;12(8):21-4.
7
Adverse Events Involving Radiation Oncology Medical Devices: Comprehensive Analysis of US Food and Drug Administration Data, 1991 to 2015.涉及放射肿瘤学医疗设备的不良事件:1991年至2015年美国食品药品监督管理局数据的综合分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jan 1;97(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.050.
8
An evaluation of the Manufacturer And User Facility Device Experience database that inspired the United States Food and Drug Administration's Reclassification of transvaginal mesh.评估制造商和用户设施设备体验数据库,该数据库启发了美国食品和药物管理局对阴道网片的重新分类。
Investig Clin Urol. 2018 Mar;59(2):126-132. doi: 10.4111/icu.2018.59.2.126. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
9
FDA use of international standards in the premarket review process.美国食品药品监督管理局在上市前审查过程中对国际标准的使用。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 1998 Sep-Oct;32(5):518-26.
10
Facilities strive to comply with new Act. The long-term effects of the Safe Medical Devices Act are still unknown.各机构努力遵守新法案。《安全医疗器械法案》的长期影响尚不明朗。
Health Prog. 1993 May;74(4):53-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishment of a medical device adverse event management system for hospitals.建立医疗器械不良事件医院管理制度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 24;22(1):1406. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08830-5.
2
From COVID-19 Pandemic to Patient Safety: A New "Spring" for Telemedicine or a Boomerang Effect?从新冠疫情到患者安全:远程医疗的新“春天”还是回旋镖效应?
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 15;9:901788. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.901788. eCollection 2022.
3
Challenges Associated with the Safety Signal Detection Process for Medical Devices.
与医疗器械安全信号检测过程相关的挑战。
Med Devices (Auckl). 2021 Feb 24;14:43-57. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S278868. eCollection 2021.