Departamento de Ecología, Universidad de Alicante, Carretera S. Vicente del Raspeig s/n, 03080, San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain.
Ecology. 2010 Jul;91(7):2110-20. doi: 10.1890/09-0385.1.
A current focus of ecology is the investigation of spatial effects on population and community dynamics; however, spatiotemporal theory remains largely untested by empirical observations or experimental studies. For example, the segregation hypothesis predicts that intraspecific aggregation should increase the importance of intraspecific competition relative to interspecific competition, thereby enhancing local coexistence in plant communities. We applied recent methods of point pattern analysis to analyze a unique long-term data set on fully mapped seedling emergence and subsequent survival in a Mediterranean gorse shrubland after experimental fires and simulated torrential rainfall events. Our overall aim was to test if the observed spatial patterns were consistent with the segregation hypothesis during the entire community dynamics from early seedling emergence to the establishment of a mature community, i.e., we explored if the observed initial segregation did indeed prevent interspecific competition from becoming dominant. We used random labeling as the null model and specific test statistics to evaluate different biological effects of the spatial interactions that determine mortality. We found that mortality was clearly not random. Comparison of the probability of mortality in dependence on the distance to conspecific and to heterospecific plants showed that mortality was controlled almost entirely by intraspecific interactions, which is consistent with the segregation hypothesis. Dead plants were aggregated and segregated from surviving plants, indicating two-sided scramble competition. Spatial interactions were density dependent and changed their sign over the course of time from positive to negative when plants grew to maturity. The simulated torrential rainfall events and subsequent erosion caused nonspecific mortality of seedlings but did not reduce the prevalence of intraspecific competition. Our results provide support for the hypothesis that the spatial distribution of plants may profoundly affect competition and can be an important determinant in the coexistence of species and biodiversity.
目前生态学的一个研究重点是调查空间效应对种群和群落动态的影响;然而,时空理论在很大程度上还没有通过实证观察或实验研究来检验。例如,隔离假说预测种内聚集应该会增加种内竞争相对于种间竞争的重要性,从而增强植物群落的局部共存。我们应用了最近的点格局分析方法来分析一个独特的长期数据集,该数据集记录了在实验火灾和模拟暴雨事件后,地中海金雀花灌丛中完全测绘的幼苗出现和随后存活的情况。我们的总体目标是检验在整个社区动态过程中,从早期幼苗出现到成熟社区建立,观察到的空间模式是否与隔离假说一致,即我们探索观察到的初始隔离是否确实防止了种间竞争占主导地位。我们使用随机标记作为零假设,并使用特定的测试统计量来评估决定死亡率的空间相互作用的不同生物学效应。我们发现死亡率显然不是随机的。根据与同种和异种植物的距离来比较死亡率的概率表明,死亡率几乎完全由种内相互作用控制,这与隔离假说一致。死亡的植物与存活的植物聚集并隔离,表明存在双向争夺竞争。空间相互作用是密度依赖的,并随着植物生长到成熟,其作用从正变为负。模拟的暴雨事件和随后的侵蚀导致了幼苗的非特异性死亡,但并没有降低种内竞争的普遍性。我们的结果支持了这样一种假设,即植物的空间分布可能会深刻影响竞争,并且可能是物种共存和生物多样性的一个重要决定因素。