Suppr超能文献

儿童白内障手术后的苏醒期躁动:咪达唑仑、丙泊酚和氯胺酮的比较

Emergence agitation after cataract surgery in children: a comparison of midazolam, propofol and ketamine.

作者信息

Chen Jiayao, Li Wenxian, Hu Xiao, Wang Dingding

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, EENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Paediatr Anaesth. 2010 Sep;20(9):873-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03375.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine whether the concurrent use of either of a subhypnotic dose of midazolam, propofol or ketamine with fentanyl just before discontinuing the sevoflurane anesthesia would effectively sedate the children as they recovered and significantly decrease the incidence and severity of emergence agitation and would not delay patient awakening and discharge.

BACKGROUND

Postoperative emergence agitation may occur in children after general anesthesia with volatile anesthetics. Children who undergo cataract surgery after sevoflurane induction and sevoflurane-remifentanil maintenance may experience this type of agitation.

METHODS/MATERIALS: In 120 un-premedicated children aged 1-7 years, mask induction with sevoflurane was performed and they were then randomly assigned to one of the three antiagitation postoperative groups (n = 40). We studied the postoperative antiagitation effects of subhypnotic doses of midazolam combined with fentanyl, propofol with fentanyl or ketamine with fentanyl administered just before discontinuing the sevoflurane anesthesia. A score for the level of agitation can be assigned based on the recovery mental state (RMS) scale and the recently published pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale (PAED). Postoperative factors assessed included emergence behaviors, the time to eye opening, the time to discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) to the ward.

RESULTS

There were significantly more agitated children in the ketamine-group when compared to the midazolam-group or to the propofol-group at all time P < 0.05), especially at 10 and 15 min. The PAED scale showed a significant advantage for midazolam-fentanyl [5 (2-15)] and propofol-fentanyl [6 (3-15)] versus ketamine-fentanyl [10 (3-20)] (P < 0.05). The time to discharge from the PACU to the ward was not significantly different among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous administration of a subhypnotic dose of midazolam or propofol in addition to a low dose of fentanyl just before discontinuing the sevoflurane anesthesia was both effective on decreasing the incidence and severity of emergence agitation in children undergoing cataract extraction without significant delaying recovery time and discharge. The effect of midazolam was clearer than that seen with propofol.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定在停用七氟醚麻醉前,同时使用亚催眠剂量的咪达唑仑、丙泊酚或氯胺酮与芬太尼,是否能在儿童苏醒过程中有效镇静,显著降低苏醒期躁动的发生率和严重程度,且不会延迟患者苏醒和出院时间。

背景

全身麻醉使用挥发性麻醉药后,儿童可能会出现术后苏醒期躁动。接受七氟醚诱导和七氟醚-瑞芬太尼维持麻醉的白内障手术患儿可能会经历此类躁动。

方法/材料:对120名年龄在1至7岁、未使用术前药的儿童进行七氟醚面罩诱导麻醉,然后将他们随机分为三个术后抗躁动组之一(n = 40)。我们研究了在停用七氟醚麻醉前,亚催眠剂量的咪达唑仑联合芬太尼、丙泊酚联合芬太尼或氯胺酮联合芬太尼的术后抗躁动效果。可根据苏醒精神状态(RMS)量表和最近发表的小儿麻醉苏醒谵妄量表(PAED)对躁动程度进行评分。评估的术后因素包括苏醒行为、睁眼时间、从麻醉后监护病房(PACU)转至病房的时间。

结果

与咪达唑仑组或丙泊酚组相比,氯胺酮组在各时间点(P < 0.05),尤其是在10分钟和15分钟时,躁动儿童明显更多。PAED量表显示,咪达唑仑-芬太尼组[5(2 - 15)]和丙泊酚-芬太尼组[6(3 - 15)]相对于氯胺酮-芬太尼组[10(3 - 20)]具有显著优势(P < 0.05)。各组从PACU转至病房的时间无显著差异。

结论

在停用七氟醚麻醉前,静脉注射亚催眠剂量的咪达唑仑或丙泊酚加小剂量芬太尼,对于降低白内障摘除术患儿苏醒期躁动的发生率和严重程度均有效,且不会显著延迟恢复时间和出院时间。咪达唑仑的效果比丙泊酚更明显。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验