Breschan Christian, Platzer Manuela, Jost Robert, Stettner Haro, Likar Rudolf
Department of Anaesthesia, LKH Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt, Austria.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2007 Apr;17(4):347-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.02101.x.
Behavioral disturbance in children following sevoflurane anesthesia is a relatively frequent event. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a higher dose of preoperatively administered rectal midazolam compared with a lower would alleviate this phenomenon. Furthermore the impact of these two doses of midazolam on sedation at induction of anesthesia was compared.
A total of 115 children presenting for minor surgery under anesthesia were included in the study. The children were randomized to receive rectally either 1 mg.kg(-1) midazolam (group H) or 0.5 mg.kg(-1) midazolam (group L). General anesthesia was induced with propofol or sevoflurane and maintained with 1.5% sevoflurane in the inspiratory limb. Prior to the start of surgery a regional block was performed to ensure adequate pain relief. Behavior on emergence was assessed using a three point scale. In case of severe agitation propofol was administered IV.
The children in group H were significantly better sedated preoperatively (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in emergence behavior: 42.1% of children in group H compared with 36.2% of children in group L exhibited severe agitation requiring sedation with propofol (P = 0.37). However, regardless of the preoperative dose of midazolam more children under the age of 36 months (61.4%) were severely distressed at emergence compared with older children (16.7%) (P < 0.01).
A higher dose of 1 mg.kg(-1) rectal midazolam results in much better sedated children on induction of anesthesia than 0.5 mg.kg(-1). This, however, does not result in a reduced incidence of emergence delirium after sevoflurane anesthesia. Regardless of the premedication negative behavioral changes occur more frequently in children younger than 3 years of age.
七氟醚麻醉后儿童出现行为紊乱是较为常见的情况。本研究旨在评估术前直肠给予较高剂量咪达唑仑与较低剂量相比是否能缓解这一现象。此外,还比较了这两种剂量咪达唑仑对麻醉诱导时镇静效果的影响。
本研究纳入了115例接受麻醉下小手术的儿童。将儿童随机分为两组,分别经直肠给予1mg·kg⁻¹咪达唑仑(H组)或0.5mg·kg⁻¹咪达唑仑(L组)。采用丙泊酚或七氟醚诱导全身麻醉,并在吸气支路中用1.5%七氟醚维持麻醉。手术开始前进行区域阻滞以确保充分的疼痛缓解。采用三点量表评估苏醒时的行为。若出现严重躁动,则静脉给予丙泊酚。
H组儿童术前镇静效果显著更好(P<0.01)。苏醒行为方面无显著差异:H组42.1%的儿童与L组36.2%的儿童出现严重躁动,需要用丙泊酚镇静(P = 0.37)。然而,无论术前咪达唑仑剂量如何,36个月以下的儿童在苏醒时出现严重烦躁不安的比例(61.4%)高于年龄较大的儿童(16.7%)(P<0.01)。
与0.5mg·kg⁻¹相比,1mg·kg⁻¹的较高剂量直肠咪达唑仑在麻醉诱导时能使儿童镇静效果更好。然而,这并未降低七氟醚麻醉后苏醒期谵妄的发生率。无论术前用药情况如何,3岁以下儿童出现负面行为变化的频率更高。