Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Veterinary Centre, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian, UK.
Equine Vet J. 2010 Sep;42(6):494-9. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00105.x.
While previous studies have demonstrated an association between equine grass sickness (EGS) and the presence of Clostridium botulinum within ileal contents and faeces, no such associations with other intestinal-derived anaerobic bacteria have been extensively investigated.
The prevalence of C. perfringens in the ileal contents and faeces of EGS horses is greater than control horses; the detection of C. perfringens in faeces by ELISA could be diagnostically beneficial in a clinical setting.
The prevalence of C. perfringens in faeces from EGS horses and healthy grazing control horses was determined by both selective culture and ELISA to permit both validation of the ELISA and inter-group comparisons. Additionally, the prevalence of C. perfringens (ELISA) in ileal contents from EGS horses was compared with that for control horses with nongastrointestinal disease. Finally, the prevalence of C. perfringens (ELISA) in faeces from EGS cases was compared with that from both horses with which they shared pasture at the time of disease onset and non-EGS colic horses.
When compared with culture, the ELISA had a sensitivity and specificity of 86 and 98%, respectively. The prevalence of C. perfringens in faeces as determined by both culture and ELISA was significantly higher (P<0.001) for EGS horses (7/9 and 15/37, respectively) than for healthy grazing controls (0/60 and 1/74, respectively). The prevalence of C. perfringens in ileal contents from EGS horses (5/10) was greater than that for horses with nongastrointestinal disease (1/12) at a level that approached significance (P = 0.056). EGS cases had a significantly greater prevalence of C. perfringens in faeces (15/37) than co-grazing horses (1/18) and colic (1/16) horses. The specificity (93%) and PPV (94%) of the detection of C. perfringens by ELISA on faecal samples in relation to disease status (EGS compared with colic horses) was good. Sensitivity (41%) and NPV (39%) were poor.
The use of a commercial ELISA to detect faecal C. perfringens may be diagnostically beneficial when differentiating EGS cases from colic cases, although further work is required to fully evaluate its potential.
虽然先前的研究表明,马的草中毒(EGS)与回肠内容物和粪便中存在肉毒梭菌之间存在关联,但尚未广泛研究其他肠道来源的厌氧细菌与 EGS 之间的关联。
EGS 马的回肠内容物和粪便中产气荚膜梭菌的检出率高于对照马;粪便中 ELISA 检测到产气荚膜梭菌在临床环境中具有诊断益处。
通过选择性培养和 ELISA 确定 EGS 马和健康放牧对照马粪便中产气荚膜梭菌的检出率,以允许 ELISA 的验证和组间比较。此外,还比较了 EGS 马的回肠内容物中产气荚膜梭菌(ELISA)与非胃肠道疾病对照马的检出率。最后,比较了 EGS 病例粪便中产气荚膜梭菌(ELISA)与疾病发作时与它们共享牧场的马以及非 EGS 绞痛马的检出率。
与培养相比,ELISA 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 86%和 98%。通过培养和 ELISA 确定的产气荚膜梭菌在粪便中的检出率在 EGS 马中明显高于健康放牧对照马(分别为 7/9 和 15/37)(P<0.001)。在 EGS 马的回肠内容物中,产气荚膜梭菌的检出率(5/10)高于非胃肠道疾病马(1/12),但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.056)。EGS 病例粪便中产气荚膜梭菌的检出率(15/37)明显高于共放牧马(1/18)和绞痛(1/16)马。ELISA 检测粪便中产气荚膜梭菌与疾病状态(与绞痛马相比)的特异性(93%)和阳性预测值(94%)良好。敏感性(41%)和阴性预测值(39%)较差。
使用商业 ELISA 检测粪便中的产气荚膜梭菌可能有助于区分 EGS 病例和绞痛病例的诊断,但需要进一步研究以充分评估其潜力。